Comparison of Weights in Simultaneous Probit Regressions in a Model for Labor Participation Estimation

Authors

  • Verónica Herrero Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas (Córdoba, Argentina)
  • Monica Bocco Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Departamento de Matemática (Córdoba, Argentina)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55444/2451.7321.2007.v45.n2.3841

Keywords:

regression with complex samples, simultaneous probit equations, design effects, collective labor participation

Abstract

Estimations of labor participation, based on samples of complex design, generally do not discuss the use of weights; implicitly considering that the data came from a simple random sampling. This paper studies the effects of the application of three weighing alternatives : i) not to weigh ii) to assign weights which are proportional to agglomerate size iii) to select a sub-sample which allow self-representation. The application is carried out for a wave of the Permanent Household Survey (Encuesta Permanente de Hogares - EPH) on a model of simultaneous probit equations. The evaluation of the estimates obtained suggests that not to weigh produces no significant biases and represents an antecedent to the empirical estimates with nonlinear models for a system of equations with limited dependent variables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2007-12-01

How to Cite

Herrero, V., & Bocco, M. (2007). Comparison of Weights in Simultaneous Probit Regressions in a Model for Labor Participation Estimation. Revista De Economía Y Estadística, 45(2), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.55444/2451.7321.2007.v45.n2.3841

Issue

Section

ARTÍCULOS