Approaches to information systems from intersubjectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58312/2591.3905.v8.n13.47513Keywords:
Social construction, Abstract language, Informed citizen, AccessibilityAbstract
The objective of the research is to identify the relationship between information systems and intersubjectivity from the phenomenological position of Alfred Schütz. Through a reflexive method, based on the theoretical assumptions of information systems similar to Schütz's perspective, having as a reference for interpretation the accessibility of information services. The results of the research indicate that information systems have the capacity to adapt to the requirements of the environment, in addition to favoring the support of the arguments that give pause to intersubjectivity, at least in the academic and research field.
Downloads
References
Acebo, E. y Brie, R. (2006). Diccionario de Sociología. Claridad.
Acevedo, M. (2011). Aportes de la teoría social de Alfred Schütz para pensar la política y la acción colectiva. Trabajo y sociedad, 15(17), 83-94. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3873/387334689007.pdf
American Library Association.(1993). Standards for accreditation of master’s programs in Library and Information Studies 1992. ALA. https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/accreditedprograms/standards/standards
Bénel, A. y Lejeune, C. (2009). Humanities 2.0: documents, interpretation and intersubjectivity in the digital age. International journal of web based communities, 5(4), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2009.028090
Brugger, W. y Schöndorf, H. (2014). Diccionario de filosofía. (R. Gabas, Trad.). Herder.
Dorsch, F. (1985). Diccionario de Psicología. España: Editorial Herder.
Feinberg, M. (2012). Information studies, the humanities, and design research: interdisciplinary opportunities. iConference 2012, February 7-10, 2012, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/2132176.2132179
Ferrater, M. (2004). Diccionario de Filosofía. Colombia: Editorial Ariel.
Fioravante, E., Vieira da Cunha, M., Agustín, M. (2017). A biblioteca escolar a partir da perspectiva sociofenomenológica. Revista interamericana de bibliotecología, 40(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v40n3a09
Galimberti, U. (2002). Diccionario de Psicología. México: de Siglo XXI Editores.
Gros, A. (2016). Alfred Schütz, un fenomenólogo inusual: una reconstrucción sistemática de la recepción Schutziana de Husserl. Discusiones filosóficas, 17(29), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2016.17.29.10
Hernández, Y. y Galindo, R. (2007). El concepto de intersubjetividad en Alfred Schutz. Espacios públicos, 10(20), 228-240. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/676/67602012.pdf
Hillmann, K. (1994). Diccionario enciclopédico de Sociología. España: Editorial Herder.
Honderich, T. (1995). Enciclopedia Oxford de Filosofía. (C. García, Trad.). España: Editorial Tecnos.
Husserl, E. (1979). Meditaciones cartesianas. (M. Presas, Trad.). Ediciones Paulinas.
Lee, A. (2004). Thinking about social theory and philosophy for information systems. En J. Mingers y L. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems. (pp. 1-26). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.people.vcu.edu/~aslee/Lee-Social-Theory-Philosophy-2004.pdf
Lien, B., Pauleen, D., Kuo, Y. y Wang, T. (2014). The rationality and objectivity of reflection in phenomenological research. Quality & Quantity: international journal of methodology, 44(1), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9759-3
Mingers, J. (1995). Information and meaning: foundations for an intersubjective account. Information systems journal, 5(4), 285-306. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/3798/
Mingers, J. (1996a). An evaluation of theories of information with regard to the semantic and pragmatic aspects of information systems. Systems practice, 9(3), 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169014
Mingers, J. (1996b). Embodying information systems. En W. Orlikowski., G. Walsham., M. Jones y J. Degross (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational work. (pp. 272-292). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34872-8_17
Motta, R. (2011). Reconstrucción de la crítica de Schütz a Husserl en torno al concepto de unidades personales de nivel superior o comunidad. Intersticios: revista sociológica de pensamiento crítico, 5(2), 365-372. https://intersticios.es/article/view/8754
Narrog, H. (2017). Three types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a synthesis. En H. Cuyckens., L. Ghesquière y D. Van Olmen (Eds.), Aspects of Grammaticalization. De Gruyter Mouton. 2017. 19-46. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110492347-002
Perlin, S. (2024). La crítica de Alfred Schütz a la intersubjetividad Husserliana: exposición y respuesta. Devenires, 25(49), 179-218. https://doi.org/10.35830/devenires.v25i49.898
Rizo, M. (2006). La intersubjetividad y la vida cotidiana como objetos de estudio de la ciencia de la comunicación: exploraciones teóricas y abordajes empíricos. En Anuario De Investigación De la Comunicación CONEICC XIII. (pp. 85-107). https://doi.org/10.38056/2006aiccXIII282
Savolainen, R. y Kari, J. (2004). Placing the Internet in information source horizons: a study of information seeking by Internet users in the context of self-development. Library & information science research, 26(4), 415-433. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818804000520
Savolainen, R. (2007). Information source horizons and source preferences of environmental activists: a social phenomenological approach. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 58(12),1709–1719. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20644
Schütz, A. (1962). El problema de la realidad social. (N. Míguez, Trad.). Amorrortu editores.
Schütz, A. (1976). Fenomenología del mundo social: introducción a la sociología comprensiva. (E. Prieto, Trad.). Paidós.
Schütz, A. (2003). Estudios sobre teoría social: Escritos II. (N. Míguez, Trad.). Amorrortu editores.
Smiraglia, R. (2014). Cultural synergy in information institutions. Springer.
Sonnenwald, D. (1999). Evolving perspectives of human information behavior: contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons. En T. Wilson y A. David (Eds.), Exploring the Contexts of Information Behaviour. (pp. 176-190). Taylor Graham. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28805117_Evolving_Perspectives_of_Human_Information_Behavior_Contexts_Situations_Social_Networks_and_Information_Horizons
Uña, O. y Hernández, A. (2004). Diccionario de Sociología. ESIC.
Vargas, G. (2018). El análisis reflexivo y el método fenomenológico: contribución a la detrascendentalización de la fenomenología. Investigaciones fenomenológicas, (7), 237-255. https://doi.org/10.5944/rif.7.2018.29935
Vivero, L. (2005). La intersubjetividad y la construcción del mundo social. Cuadernos de trabajo social, (1), 44-47. https://tscuadernosdetrabajosocial.cl/index.php/TS/article/view/49/47
Warren, H. (1970). Diccionario de Psicología. (E. Ímaz, A. Alatorre y L. Alaminos, Trad.). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Willis, P. (1999). Looking for what it's really like: phenomenology in reflective practice. Studies in continuing education, 21(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037990210106
Wise, V. (1998). Of lizards, intersubjective zap, and trashing: critical legal studies and the librarian. Legal reference services quarterly, 8(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1300/J113v08n01_02
