Work environment: perception of nursing staff and opportunities for improvement.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59843/2618-3692.v24.n42.42981Keywords:
work environment, nursing, perception, participatory action research, Community-Based Participatory ResearchAbstract
This research aims to analyze the perception of nursing staff about the work environment they experience, opportunities for improvement will be identified through self-management of capacities and actions will be put into practice that will be evaluated to determine the impact they produced. Material and method: a study was carried out applying the participatory action research model with the nursing staff of the general boarding school of Sanatorio Allende in the year 2022. For the initial data collection, a digital survey was provided that assessed the personal opinion on the perceived work environment. It is carried out with the complete team of nurses from the general internship, which is made up of 15 nurses. Due to the number of members, a sample will not be made, but all will be contemplated. The process consisted of five stages: approach and awareness, induction, interaction, implementation, and systematization. Results: a synthesis of the most outstanding results in each stage is presented: the origin of the situation raised, review of the bibliography, the actions to achieve rapprochement, the arguments used in raising awareness, the tools for induction, the achievement of the interaction and how the improvement opportunities were applied through a systematization. Conclusions: participatory action research allowed professionals to determine what their current perception of their work environment is, individually they built possible solutions to obstacles in teamwork that could be put into practice collectively and thus be able to reassess in the future if it is It is necessary to preserve or modify actions since they are authors and participate in the improvement actions.
Downloads
References
1. Vera de Corbalán M., Samudio M. Clima organizacional de enfermería en los hospitales regionales del Instituto de Previsión Social [Internet]. Una.py. IICS; 2013 [citado el 17 de agosto de 2022]. Disponible en: http://scielo.iics. una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1812-95282013000200006&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
2. Cantero MS, Gómez G.E., Portillo E.A., Auchter M., Benitez N., Acevedo F. El clima laboral desde percepciones del profesional de enfermería de instituciones hospitalarias públicas de Corrientes capital. Rev. Fac. Med. Univ. Na.c Nordeste [Internet]. 2019 [citado el 17 de agosto de 2022];20–32. Disponible en: https:// pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/es/biblio-1119116
3. Granero Lázaro A. Calidad de vida laboral de las enfermeras: evaluación y propuestas de mejora. Universitad de Barcelona; [Internet]. 2017 [citado el 15 de agosto de 2022];20–32. Disponible en: https://www.tdx.cat/ bitstream/handle/10803/404610/AGL_TESIS.pdf?sequence
4. Holter, I.M., & Schwartz-Barcott, D. (1993). Action research: what is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 298-304
5. Breda, K.L., Anderson, M.A., Hansen, L., Hayes, D., Pillion, C., & Lyon, P. (1997). Enhanced Nursing Autonomy through Participatory Action Research. Nursing Outlook, 45 (2), 76-81
6. Greenwood, D.J., & Levin M. (1998). Introduction to Action Research. Social Research for Social Change. London: SAGE
7. Bellman, L. (1996). Changing nursing practice through reflection on the Roper, Logan and Tierney model: the enhancement approach to action research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24, 129-138
8. Munten, G., Van den Bogaard, J., Cox, K., Garretsen, H., & Bongers, I. (2010). Implementation of EvidenceBased Practice in Nursing Using Action Research: a Review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 7(3), 135-57
9. González J. M. Técnicas de investigación cualitativa en los ámbitos sanitario y sociosanitario. [Internet]. Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla. La Mancha. 2021. [revisión; 22/09/22]. Disponible en: https:// ruidera.uclm.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10578/28527/02%20TECNICAS-INVESTIGACION-WEB-2. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
10. Nieto M. Francis Bacon. Historia de la ciencia. (1561-1626). [Internet]. [revisión; 26/09/22]. Disponible en: https://historiadelaciencia-mnieto.uniandes.edu.co/pdf/FRANCISBACON.pdf
11. Rodríguez Díaz A. El Método Científico como Proceso Sistémico: de la Inducción - Deducción a su Representación. 2021. [Internet].[revisión;26/09/22]. Disponible en: https://static1.squarespace.com/ static/55564587e4b0d1d3fb1eda6b/t/607776794181f93a2f59fe87/1618441871857/Rodr%C3%ADguezD%C3%ADaz+-+VM+V5N%7C+2021-+9-26.pdf
12. Balcasar F. Investigación acción participativa (iap): Aspectos conceptuales y dificultades de implementación. Fundamentos en humanidades Universidad Nacional de San Luis. (2003). Internet 26/09/22. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1272956
13. Corpa E. La investigación-acción-participativa. Una forma de investigar en la práctica enfermera.(2010). Internet26/09/22. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/iee/v28n3/v28n3a17.pdf
14. Cantero M., Gómez G, et al. El clima laboral desde las percepciones del profesional de enfermería de instituciones hospitalarias públicas de Corrientes capital. (2019). Internet 26/09/22. Disponible en: https:// pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/es/biblio-1119116
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sanatorio Allende
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
