Eficiencia en la administración de justicia en Argentina
Abstract
This paper uses a non-parametric model to evaluate the performance of the administration of ordinary justice in the provinces of Argentina. The number of judges, officers and judicial employees were considered as dimensions of analysis; the resolution rate of cases entered and the resolution rate through mediation, as measures of performance. We applied the DEA VRS model and Super-efficient model. The results allowed the identification of best practice jurisdictions and suggested intervention measures for inefficient provinces to improve their performance.
Downloads
References
ATTAULLAH SHAH H.; ALI SHAH J.; SMITH G.; LABIANCA J. (2017): “JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE: AN INTERNATIONAL STUDY”. Journal of Corporate Finance - Vol 44 – págs. 255 - 274.
BANKER, R. D., CHARNES, A. Y COOPER, W. W. (1984): “SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS”. Management Science – Vol 30 (9) – págs. 1078 - 1092.
BRUNETTI A.; WEDER B. (2003): “A FREE PRESS IS BAD NEWS FOR CORRUPTION”. Journal of Public Economics – Vol 87 – págs. 1801-1824.
CHARNES, A.; COOPER, W. W.; RHODES, E. (1978): “MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION MAKING UNITS”. European Journal of Operational Research - Vol 6 (2) - págs. 429 - 444.
COELLI, TIM J., PRASADA RAO, D.S., O’DONNELL, C.J. Y BATTESE, G.E. (2005): AN INTRODUCTION TO EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York.
COOPER, W.W., SEIFORD, L.M. AND TONE, K. (2007): DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS: A COMPREHENSIVE TEXT WITH MODELS, APPLICATIONS, REFERENCES AND DEA-SOLVER SOFTWARE. 2nd Edition, Springer, New York.
DOYLE J. y GREEN R. (1994): “EFFICIENCY AND CROSS –EFFICIENCY IN DEA: DERIVATIONS, MEANINGS AND USES”. Journal of Operations Research Society - Vol. 45 (5) - págs. 567- 578.
FALAVIGNA G.; IPPOLITI R.; MANELLO A.; RAMELLO J. B. (2015): “JUDICIAL PRODUCTIVITY, DELAY AND EFFICIENCY: A DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE FUNCTION (DDF) APPROACH”. European Journal of Operational Research - Vol 240 (2) – págs. 592 - 601.
FERNÁNDEZ GARCÍA J. F.; AZEVEDO CASTRO R. (2007): “APLICACIÓN DEL MODELO DE ANÁLISIS ENVOLVENTE DE DATOS A LAS CORTES DE APELACIONES”. Serie Informe Político 98, ISSN 0717-1560.
GARAVANO G.; RODRÍGUEZ ESTEVEZ J. M. (1999): ”INDICADORES DE DESEMPEÑO Y PRODUCTIVIDAD DEL SISTEMA JUDICIAL ARGENTINO”. http://www.gestionjudicial.com.ar/index.php/home-page/lista-completa/item/7-estadisticas/66-indicadores-de-desempeno-y-productividad-del-sistema-judicial-argentino#.XjxSt2hKhdg
GARCÍA RUBIO M. A.; ROSALES LÓPEZ V. (2010): “JUSTICIA Y ECONOMÍA: EVALUANDO LA EFICIENCIA JUDICIAL EN ANDALUCÍA”. InDret. Revista para el Derecho. https://indret.com/wp-content/themes/indret/pdf/773_es.pdf
HOLLINGSWORTH, B.; SMITH, P. (2003). “USE OF RATIOS IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS”. Applied Economics Letters - Vol 10 (11) – págs. 733- 735.
PEDRAJA CHAPARRO F.; SALINAS JIMÉNEZ J. (1996): “AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SPANISH COURTS USING DEA”. Applied Economics – Vol 28 – págs.1391 - 1403.
PONTUS M.; CLAES T. (2019): “POTENTIAL EFFICIENCY EFFECTS OF MERGING THE SWEDISH DISTRICT COURTS”. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences - Vol 67 – págs. 58- 68.
RAMELLO G. R.; VOIGT S. (2012): “THE ECONOMICS OF EFFICIENCY AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM”. International Review of Law and Economics - Vol 32 (1) - págs. 1- 12.
SEXTON T. R. (1986). “THE METHODOLOGY OF DEA” IN MEASURING EFFICIENCY: AN ASSESSMENT OF DEA”. Ed. RH Silkman, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA - págs. 73 -104.
SILVA, M. C. A. (2018): "OUTPUT-SPECIFIC INPUTS IN DEA: AN APPLICATION TO COURTS OF JUSTICE IN PORTUGAL" Omega- Elsevier- Vol. 79 - págs. 43 - 53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la misma licencia del original.
