Exploración de tendencias en estructuración de problemas multicriterio
Keywords:
multi-criteria analysis, problem structuring, decision making, MCDA, PSMAbstract
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis –MCDA- has been extensively used in Management Science as a tool for evaluating options for complex decisions which several alternatives involving conflicting criteria.Despite the importance of the formulation of problems in decision-making, we find less literature on the process of articulation and definition of a multi-criteria problem.
This paper examines the role of problem structuring MCDA interventions, based on the definition of the problem and the required level of participation for the proper structuring of the model, placing the structuring within the MCDA process. PSM Problem Structuring Methods are mentioned; with its main characteristics and foundations, like tools that may be employed to support structuring activity.
The work is based on a bibliographical exploration presenting the concepts of the international main relating experts and the tendencies of the topic structuring of problems inside MCDA.
The developed methods are structured and rigorous in order to reach effective results, in spite of being considered to PSM like "soft? Operational Research.
Downloads
References
ACKOFF, R.L. (1979) ―THE FUTURE OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH IS PAST.‖ Journal of the Operational Research Society 30, 93–104.
BELTON, V. and STEWART, T.J. (2002) ―MULTI CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS- AND INTEGRATED APPROACH‖. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group. The Netherlands.
BELTON, V. and STEWART, T.J. (2010), Cap. 8, ―PROBLEM STRUCTURING AND MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS‖ en EHRGOTT, M., FIGUEIRA, J.R. & GRECCO, S. editors (2010) ―TRENDS IN MULTIPLIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS‖. Springer.
BROWN, J., COOPER, C., PIDD, M. (2006) ―A TAXING PROBLEM: THE COMPLEMENTARY USE OF HARD AND SOFT OR IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR‖. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 172, Issue 2, 666-679.
BUEDE, D.M. (1986) ―STRUCTURING VALUE ATTRIBUTES‖ Interfaces 16:52-62.
CORNER, J., BUCHANAN, J. y HENIG, M. (2001) ―DYNAMIC DECISION PROBLEM STRUCTURING‖ Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 10:129-141.
BRYSON J.M. (2003) ―WHAT TO DO WHEN STAKEHOLDERS MATTER: A GUIDE TO STAKEHOLDERS IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS TECHINIQUES‖. Paper of National Public Management Research Conference. 9-11 October 2003. Georgetown University Public Policy Institute. Washington DC. USA.
EDEN, C. (1988) ―COGNITIVE MAPPING: A REVIEW‖ European Journal of Operational Research 36, 1-13.
EDEN, C. (2004) ―ANALIZYNG COGNITIVE MAPS TO HELP STRUCTURE ISSUE OR PROBLEMS‖. European Journal of Operational Research 159, 673-686.
EHRGOTT, M., FIGUEIRA, J.R. & GRECCO, S. (2010) ―TRENDS IN MULTIPLIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS‖. Springer. FRANCO, L. and MONTIBELLER, G.,(2009) ―PROBLEM STRUCTURING FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS INTERVENTIONS‖. The Operational Research Group, Department of Management. London School of Economics and Political Science. Great Britain.
FRIEND, J. (1989). ―THE STRATEGIC CHOICE APPROACH‖ Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science
HARRIS, J. y PARNELL, S. (2004) ―BRAC 2005: IMPLEMENTATION DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS‖.Operations Research Center of Excelente. Technical Report DSE-TR-0409. United States Military Academy. West Point. New York.
HOWARD, N. (2004) ―RESOLVING CONFLICTS IN A TREE: DRAMA THEORY IN THE EXTENSIVE FORM‖ en IMA conference: Analyzing conflict and its resolution. Oxford.
KEENEY, R.L. (1992) ―VALUE-FOCUSED THINKING: A PATH TO CREATIVE DECISION MAKING‖ Harvard University Press. USA
KEENEY, R.L. (1996) ―VALUE-FOCUSED THINKING: IDENTIFYING DECISION OPPORTUNITIES AND CREATING ALTERNATIVES‖ European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 537–549
NUTT, P.C. (2001). ―Decision Debacles and How to Avoid Them‖, Business Strategy Review, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 1-14.
MINGERS, J. y ROSENHEAD J. (2004) ―PROBLEM STRUCTURING METHODS IN ACTION‖ European Journal of Operational Research 152, 530-534.
MINGERS, J. (2011) ―SOFT OR COMES OF AGE-BUT NOT EVERYWHERE‖. Omega. Vol. 39, Issue 6, 729-741
PIDD, M. (1996) ―Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science‖ John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
von WINTERFELD, D. (1980) ―STRUCTURING DECISION PROBLEMS FOR DECISION ANÁLISIS‖. Acta Psycologica 45, Pag 71 a 93.
REYNOLS, M. y HOLWELL, S. (2010) ―SYSTEM APPROACHES TO MANAGING CHANGE: A PRACTICAL GUIDE‖. SRINGER London in association with The Open University. United Kingdom
ROSENHEAD, J. (2006) ―PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF PROBLEM STRUCTURING METHODS‖. Journal or the Operational Research Society 57, 759-765
ROY, B. (1996) ―MULTICRITERIA METHODOLOGY FOR DECISION AIDING‖ Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrech, Netherlands.
SHAW, D., FRANCO, A., WESTCOMBE M. (2006) ―PROBLEM STRUCTURING METHODS: NEW DIRECTIONS IN PROBLEMATIC WORLD‖. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57:757-758.
WONG, H.Y y ROSENHEAD, J. (2000) ―A RIGOROUS DEFINITION OF ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS‖. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 176-182
ZOPOUDINES, C., PARDALOS, P.M. (2010), ―HANDBOOK OF MULTICRITERIA ANALISYS‖. Springer, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la misma licencia del original.
