THE PROFESSION OF BEING A TEACHER

AGENCY AND TEACHING PARTNER

Authors

  • Daiana Yamila Rigo Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto
  • Rosana Beatriz Squillari Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto

Keywords:

agency, teacher training, pedagogical partner, educational practices

Abstract

The present work describes a study carried out between 2021 and 2022 with the objective of knowing if the work in pedagogical pairs promotes the agency of future trainers from the planning of an inverted class on specific topics of Political Science. The research was carried out together with 25 students, second and fourth year of the Legal, Political and Social Sciences Faculty taught by the National University of Río Cuarto (UNRC), Argentina. For data collection, a questionnaire with open questions was used, while the methodological design is qualitative, administered online. The results show that the agency of the students is built and expressed in three situations linked to training and teaching practices: the construction of knowledge, dialogue and exchanges of support and unforeseen events. What was found is relevant to rethink initial teacher training and the ways to promote educational contexts that invite the proactive participation of students in their own practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daiana Yamila Rigo , Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto

Doctora en Psicología. Máster en Psicología de la Educación y en Ciencias Sociales. Licenciada en Psicopedagogía. Investigadora adjunta del CONICET. Docente adjunta en la Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Línea de investigación: compromiso y experiencias educativas.

Rosana Beatriz Squillari, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto

Profesora en Ciencias Jurídicas, Políticas y Sociales. Magíster en Ética Aplicada. Miembro de la Fundación ICALA. Docente asociada e investigadora del Departamento de Ciencias Jurídicas, Políticas y Sociales, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto.

References

Askew, S. y Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping- pong and loops – linking feedback and learning. En S. Askew (Ed.). Feedback for learning (pp. 1-19). Routledge.

Aspbury-Miyanishi, E. (2022). The affordances beyond what one does: Reconceptualizing teacher agency with Heidegger and Ecological Psychology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103662

Baynham, M. (2006). Agency and contingency in the language learning of refugees and asylum seekers. Linguistics and Education, 17(1), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.08.008

Biesta, G. y Tedder, M. (2007). How Is Agency Possible? Towards an Ecological Understanding of Agency-as-Achievement. Learning Lives: Learning, Identity, and Agency in the Life Course. Working Paper Five, Exeter: Teaching and Learning Research Programme. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1447548

Charteris, J. y Smardon, D. (2015). Teacher agency and dialogic feedback: Using classroom data for practitioner inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.05.006

Cresswell, J. (2015). A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Sage.

Edwards, A. (2017). The dialectic of person and practice: How cultural-historic accounts of agency an inform teacher education. En J. Clandinin y J. Husu (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research on teacher education. Sage.

Gaitán-Pedraza, Germán, Villamizar, Diego F. y García-Díaz, John J. (2022). La práctica reflexiva en la práctica pedagógica de dos licenciaturas en educación física: narrativas de docentes en formación. Formación universitaria, 15(3), 119-132. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062022000300119

Gottlieb, D. (2012). Beyond a rule-following model of skillful practice in teacher development. Educational Theory, 62(5), 501-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00459.x

Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Trans. C. Lenhardt & S. Weber Nicholson. MIT Press.

Kim, M. Y. y Wilkinson, I. (2019). What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003.

Kornblit, A. L. (2007). Metodologías cualitativas en ciencias sociales. Biblos.

Lane, J. L. y Sweeny, S. P. (2019). Understanding agency and organization in early career teachers’ professional tie formation. Journal of Educational Change, 20(1), 79–104.

Loizaga, A., Stefanolo, M. y Tevez, D. (29 de mayo 2009). La pareja pedagógica como dispositivo de intervención en integración escolar. https://ele.chaco.gob.ar/pluginfile.php/991598/mod_folder/content/0/7.%20Material%20N%C2%B0%207%20-%20%E2%80%9CLa%20pareja%20pedag%C3%B3gica%20como%20dispositivo%20de%20intervenci%C3%B3n%20en%20integraci%C3%B3n%20escolar%E2%80%9D%20%281%29.pdf?forcedownload=1

Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters.

Moate, J. (2014). Dialogic struggles and pedagogic innovation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(2), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.891641

Omland, M. y Rødnes, K. (2020). Building agency through technology-aided dialogic teaching. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 26, 100406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100406

Perrenoud, P. (2014). Desarrollar la práctica reflexiva en el oficio de enseñar. Graó.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. y Robinson S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. En M. Priestley, G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. Bloomsbury Academic.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. y Robinson, S (2015). Teacher agency: What is it and why does it matter? En R. Kneyber, J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the system: Changing education from the bottom up. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678573

Sanjurjo, L., Caporossi, A., Placci, N. (20 septiembre, 2016). La pareja pedagógica como dispositivo de evaluación en la formación docente universitaria. http://ridaa.unq.edu.ar/handle/20.500.11807/764

Teng, F. (2019). Autonomy, agency, and identity in teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Springer.

Van Lier, L. (2001). Constraints and resources in classroom talk: issues of equality and symmetry. En C. Candlin, N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context. Routledge.

Published

2023-12-12

How to Cite

Rigo , D. Y., & Squillari, R. B. (2023). THE PROFESSION OF BEING A TEACHER: AGENCY AND TEACHING PARTNER. Educación, formación E investigación, 9(16), 79–94. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/efi/article/view/43612