Modernity imagined, the nation exhumed: historiography and postcolonialism in West Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53872/2422.7544.n8.9933Keywords:
African Historiography, Atlantic Slave Trade, Posctocolonialism, Dahomey, Nation States FormationAbstract
This article poses a theoretical reflection about the main concerns in African historiography produced in the ‘70, period of its academic consolidation. The coeval creation of independent nation states becomes a starting point to analyze in those historical writings– produced by African historians, normally as the Ph D Thesis submitted at metropolitan universities— the urgency to create a vernacular historical version of political modernity, together with the hallmark of native, “endogenous” narratives. In this sense, I analyze the constant tension between translation and rejection of European historical and theoretical thinking. Particularly I take in this article the writings of I. A. Akinjogbin –a prominent historian of slave trade—trying to put in context his thinking with the academic struggles, to allocate Africa (in this specific case Dahomey, current Benin) into a new “imagined African modernity”. At the same time, this modernity would define the borders, originality and specificity of the “new nations”.
Downloads
References
Adeyinka, A., 1974, “King Ghezo of Dahomey (1818-1858). A reassessment of a West African monarch in the XIX century”, African Studies Review, 17(3).
Akinjogbin, I. A., 1967, Dahomey and its neighbours, 1708-1818, University of Cambridge Press, Londres.
Bay, E., 1998, Wives of the leopard. Gender, politics and culture in the kingdom of Dahomey, Virginia University Press, Charlotesville.
Bhabha, H., 2002 [1994], “Signos tomados por prodigios: cuestiones de autoridad y ambivalencia bajo un árbol a las afueras de Delhi, 1817”, en: El lugar de la cultura, trad. César Aira, Manantial, Buenos Aires.
Bhabha, H., 2002 [1994], “DisemiNación: el tiempo, el relato y los márgenes de la nación moderna”, en: El lugar de la cultura, trad. César Aira, Manantial, Buenos Aires.
Bhabha, H., 2002 [1994], “El compromiso con la teoría”, en El lugar de la cultura, trad. César Aira, Manantial, Buenos Aires.
Campion Vincent, V., 1967, “L’image du Dahomey dans la presse française (1890- 1895): Les sacrifices humains”, Cahiers d’Études Africaines, 7, 25.
Chakrabarty, D., 2000, Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial thought and historical difference, Princeton University Press.
Cohen, D. W., 1994, The combing of history, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Cooper, F., 1997, “Between Metropole and Colony: Rethinking a Research Agenda”, in Cooper, F. y Stoler, A. (orgs.): Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Cooper, F., 2000, “Africa’s past and Africa’s historians”, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 34, 2.
Coundouriotis, E., 1999, Claiming history. Colonialism, ethnography, and the novel; Columbia University Press, New York.
Derrida, J., 1998 [1988], “Firma, acontecimiento, contexto”, en Márgenes de la filosofía, Cátedra, Madrid.
Dibua, J. I., 1997, “The idol, its worshippers, and the crisis of relevance of historical scholarship in Nigeria”, History in Africa, 24.
Diouf, M., 1999, “Introduction: entre L’Afrique et l’Inde : sur les questions coloniales et nationales. Ecritures de l’histoire et recherches historiques ” en Diouf, M. (comp.): L’historiographie indienne en débat. Colonialisme, nationalisme et societés postcoloniales, Sephis/Karthala, Paris-Amsterdam.
Diouf, M., 2000, “Des historiens et des histoires, pour quoi faire? L’histoire africaine entre l’état et les communautés”, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 34 (2).
Djivo, A., 1977, Guezo la rénovation du Dahomey, Paris, ABC.
Duara, P., 1995, Rescuing history from the nation: Questioning narratives on modern China, University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
Dube, S., 2002, “Introduction: Enchantments of Modernity”, en: Dube, S. (ed.): Enduring Enchantments, Num. Esp. de South Atlantic Quarterly, Duke University Press, 4, 101.
Dube, S., 2003, Genealogías del presente. Conversión, colonialismo,cultura; ed. El Colegio de México–CEAA, México.
Dube, S., 2004a, “Espacios encantados y lugares modernos”, en Dube, Saurabh; Banerjee-Dube, Ishita; Mignolo, Walter (coords.): Modernidades coloniales. Otros pasados, historias presentes; ed. El Colegio de México–CEAA, México.
Dube, S., 2004b, Stitches on time. Colonial textures and postcolonial tangles, Duke University Press, Durham and London.
Fabian, J., 1983, Time and the Other. How Anthropology Makes its Object, Nueva York.
Foucault, Michel, 1992, “Nietzsche, la genealogía, la historia”, en: Microfísica del poder, La Piqueta, Madrid.
Glele, M., 1974, Le Danxomé. Du pouvoir Aja à la nation Fon, Paris, Nubia.
Harneit-Sievers, A., 2002, “Introduction: new local historiographies from Africa and South Asia: approaches and issues”, en Harneit-Sievers, A. (ed.): A place in the world: new local historiographies from Africa and South Asia, Brill, Leiden-Boston-Köln.
Hazoumé, P., 1990, Doguicimi, ed. Three Continent Press, Washington. Trad. al inglés de Richard Bjorson [1ª. ed. en francés 1938, ed. Larose].
Jewsiewicki, B., 1986, “Introduction: One Historiography or Several? A Requiem for Africanism”, in B. Jewsiewicki, C. Newbury, (orgs.) African Historiographies. What History for Which Africa? (California, Sage), pp. 10 y ss
Kosseleck, R., 1993 [1979], Futuro Pasado. Para una semántica de los tiempos históricos, Paidós, Barcelona.
Law, R., 1988, “History and legitimacy: aspects of the use of the past in precolonial Dahomey”, History in Africa, XV.
Law, R., 1991, The slave coast of West Africa. The impact of the Atlantic slave trade on an African society (1550-1750) Oxford, Clarendon.
Law, R., 1986, “Dahomey and the slave trade: reflections on the historiography of the rise of Dahomey”, Journal of African History, 27.
Lonsdale, J., 1989, “African pasts in Africa’s future”, Canadian Journal of African Studies, v. 23, 1.
Nietzsche, F., 1998, Sobre verdad y perjuicio de la historia para la vida, Alcion Editora, Córdoba. [Trad. del alemán Oscar Caeiro].
Polanyi, K., 1967, Dahomey and the slave trade, University of Washington Press, Washington.
Prakash, G., 1999, “Peut-on écrire des histoires postorientalistes du Tiers Monde? Réponses de l’historiographie indienne” en Diouf, M (dir.): L’historiographie indienne en débat. Colonialisme, nationalisme et societés postcoloniales, Sephis/Karthala, Paris-Amsterdam.
Preston Blier, S., 1995, “The path of the leopard: motherhood and majesty in early Danhomé”, Journal of African History, 36 (3).
Ross, D., 1983, “European models and West African History. Further comments on recent historiography of Dahomey”, History in Africa, 10.
Ross, D., 1985, “Mid-XIX century Dahomey: recent views vs. contemporary evidence”, History in Africa, 12.
Rufer, M., 2005, “La diáspora exorcizada, la etnicidad (re)inventada: historiografía postcolonial y políticas de la memoria sobre Dahomey”, Afro-Asia, Universidad Federal de Bahía, Brasil, No. 133.
Rufer, M., 2006, Reinscripciones del pasado. Nación, destino y postcolonialismo en la historiografía africana, ed. El Colegio de México, México, (en prensa).
Said, E., 1993, Culture and Imperialism, New York.
Schmucler, H., 1998, “Entre historia y memoria”, Estudios, No. 10, Centro de Estudios Avanzados, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
Soumonni, E., 2001a. Soumonni, E, 2001b
Vansina, J., 1985, Oral tradition as History, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.
Yoder, J., 1974, “Fly and Elephant parties: political polarization in Dahomey, 1840-1870”, Journal of African History, XV, 3.
Young, R., 1990, White mythologies. Writing history and the West, Routledge, London & New York.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Cuadernos de historia. Serie Economía y Sociedad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal accept the following terms:
a. The author maintains their copyrights and grants this journal the publication of the first original version of their work that is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. This license agreement allows:
Sharing — copy and redistribution of the published material by any means and formats
Reusing — remix, change, and creation of new material from the published work for any purpose, including commercial use.
b. Authors may enter other non-exclusive license agreements of distribution of the version of the published work (i.e. uploading the material on an institutional virtual archive or republishing it on a monographic volume) as long as they attribute the publication of the original version to this journal.
c. It is allowed and recommended that authors publicize their work on the Internet (i.e. on institutional virtual archives or on their personal or professional websites) after their work has been published in this journal.
