Periodization in Prehistory, Transition and the History of Economic Thougt in Latin America: an Expanded View
Keywords:
History of Economic Thought, Latin America, economic debates, periodisationAbstract
This paper intends to make an extended periodization of the economic discussions that have taken place in Latin America throughout its history. The work proposal is ambitious, however, it starts with the periodization that Oreste Popescu elaborated and it will be expanded and modified. We still have to work on the training of Latin American economists, not only due to the lack of knowledge they have about the region but also due to the lack of knowledge they have about the economic debates that have taken place. This is an approach and a provocation to start discussing these issues.
Downloads
References
Barrionuevo, L. y Luc, M. (2014). “¿Desarrollos alternativos o alternativas al desarrollo? Diálogos desde la Economía Política y el Buen Vivir”. En Peyloubet, P., et. al. Reflexiones y experiencias situadas: una contribución a la pluralización del conocimiento (pp. 131-152). Córdoba, Argentina. CONICET.
Bielschowsky, R (2009). “Sesenta años de la CEPAL: estructuralismo y neoestructuralismo”. Revista CEPAL, vol. 97, pp. 173-194.
Blanco, A. (2015). “Some considerations on the influence of economic liberalism in the May Revolution of 1810”. Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 2, N° 1, pp. 36-47.
Bloch, M. (1949) [2011]. Introducción a la historia. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México D.F. Version digital Kindle.
Cardoso, José Luis (2003). “The international diffusion of economic thought”. In: Samuels, Warren; Jeff Biddle and John Davis (eds.). A Companion to the History of Economic Thought. Oxford and New York: Blackwell.
Cardoso, José Luis (2017). “Circulating economic ideas: adaptation, appropriation, translation”. In: Cunha, Alexandre M. and Carlos E. Suprinyak (eds.). The Political Economy of Latin American Indepenence. London: Routledge.
Consuegra, J. (1983). “Las ideas económicas de Simón Bolívar”. Problemas del Desarrollo. Vol. 14, No. 53, pp. 27-50.
Cunha, A. M. & Suprinyak, C. E. (2017). “Political Economy and Latin American Independence from the 19th to the 20th Century”. In: Cunha, Alexandre M. and Carlos E. Suprinyak (eds.). The Political Economy of Latin American Indepenence. London: Routledge.
Del Popolo, F. y Jaspers, D. (2014). Los pueblos indígenas en América Latina. Avances en el último decenio y retos pendientes para la garantía de sus derechos. Síntesis. Santiago, Chile. CEPAL.
Di Filippo, A. (2009). “Estructuralismo latinoamericano y teoría económica”. Revista CEPAL 98, pp. 181-203.
Edward, José (2018). “História del pensamiento económico en Chile, 1790-1970”. In: Robles, Claudio (ed.). História Política de Chile, 1810-2010, Tomo III: Problemas Económicos. Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Glyn, D. (1968). El concepto de la prehistoria. Barcelona, España. Editorial Labor.
Goodwin, C. D. (1972). “Economic theory and society: a plea for process analysis”. American Economic Review, 62(2), 409–415.
Lluch, E. (1980). “On the national history of economic thought”. Introduction to A. Florez Estrada, Curso de Economía Política (1828). Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales (reprint).
Marini, R. M. (2008) [1973]. “La dialéctica de la dependencia”. En América Latina, dependencia y globalización. Fundamentos conceptuales Ruy Mauro Marini. Antología y presentación Carlos Eduardo Martins. Bogotá, Colombia. Siglo del Hombre – CLACSO.
Popescu, O. (1960). “Belgrano, Echevería, Gesell”. Económica; vol. 7, no. 25-26, pp. 39-132.
Popescu, O. (1965). “Historia de la historia del pensamiento económico”. Revista de Economía y Estadística Tercera Época, Vol.9, No.1-2-3-4: 1º, 2º, 3º y 4ºTrimestre, pp.163-232. Recuperado de: http://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/REyE/article/view/3594
Popescu, O. (1986). “El Pensamiento Económico en la escolástica hispanoamericana”. Revista Económica, Vol. XXXII, N° 2, pp. 227-260.
Popescu, O. (1989). “Economía Indiana”. Revista Económica, Vol. XXXV, N° 1-2, pp. 37-69.
Popescu, O. (2000). “La periodización en la historia del pensamiento económico”. Cuadernos de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Nº 38, pp. 87-114.
Popescu, O. (2000). “Aspectos Analíticos en la doctrina del justo precio en Juan de Matienzo (1520-1579)”. Buenos Aires, Argentina. Programa Bibleh, CONICET.
Popescu, O. (2003) [1986]. Studies in the history of Latin America economic thought. London, Englend. Routlege.
Prebisch, R. (2012) [1949]. El desarrollo económico de la América Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas. Santiago de Chile, Chile. CEPAL. Recuperado de: http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40010/1/prebisch_desarrollo_problemas.pdf
Roncaglia, A. (2017). Breve historia del pensamiento económico. Zaragoza, España. Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Schumpeter, J. (2015) [1954]. Historia del análisis económico. Barcelona, España. Editorial Ariel.
Spengler, J. A. (1970). “Notes on the international transmission of economic ideas”. History of Political Economy, 2(1), 133–151.
Wilson, D. (1851). The Archeology and Prehistoric Annals of Scotland. Edinburgh, Escocia. Recuperado de: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/47948/47948-h/47948-h.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following terms:
Authors will conserve their copyright and guarantee the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International License that allows third parties to share the work as long as the author and first publication of this magazine are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access)
