Past and possible futures of the Argentine electricity sector
Keywords:
Electricity markets, Regulation, ArgentinaAbstract
The Argentinean electricity sector was modernized in the 1990s with aims to promote technological change, privatization, and regulation through specific agencies, alongside a macroeconomic stabilization plan. After the 2001 crisis, tariffs were frozen, leading to distortions characterized by heavy subsidies and reduced reliance on market mechanisms. The exploration focuses on alternative institutional frameworks aiming to recreate strong modernization incentives seen in the 1990s, while addressing regulatory issues related to investment incentives in generation, equity distribution, and recent technological developments (such as distributed generation, increasing role of renewables, and smart meters). The analysis questions the outcomes of the 1990s reforms, considering both positive and negative experiences, and discusses potential institutional designs that could simultaneously enhance efficiency, equity, and facilitate an orderly transition to new technological advancements.
Downloads
References
Cont, W. (Editor) (2021). IDEAL 2021: Reducing service gaps: how digitalization can improve the use of infrastructure. Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF, Development Bank for Latin America).
Cont W., F. Navajas, A. Porto y F. Pizzi (2021). Precios y Tarifas y Política Económica. Argentina 1945-2019, La Plata: CEFIP y UNLP. Abril
Chao H., y Huntington, H. (1998). Designing market electricity markets. Kluwer.
Chao, H. y S. Peck, 1996. “A Market Mechanism for Electric Power Transmission,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 10:1, pp. 25-59.
Chisari, O. O., y Ferro, G. (2005). Macroeconomic shocks and regulatory dilemmas: The affordability and sustainability constraints and the Argentine default experience. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 45(2-3), 403-420.
Chisari, O. O. y Ferro, G. (2010). Tópicos de Economía de la Regulación de los Servicios Públicos. En Hal-Archives Ouvertes, hal-00473038, 04/2010. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00473038/en/
Cramton P. (2017). Electricity market design. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33, 4, pp. 589–612.
Cramton, P, A Ockenfels y S. Stoft (2013). Capacity Market Fundamentals. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 2:2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.2.2.2
De Witte, K. y Dijkgraaf, E. (2007). Mean and bold? On separating merger economies from structural efficiency gains in the drinking water sector. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2007-092/3.
Dileep, G. (2020). A Survey on Smart Grid Technologies and Applications. Renewable Energy 146, 2589-2625.
Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) (2023). Wholesale Electricity Market Design: Rationale and Choices. The World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/39720
Fernández, S. (2020). Energías renovables en Argentina: análisis de los precios obtenidos en Renovar. Tesis de Maestría en Energía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Centro de Estudios de la Actividad Regulatoria Energética (CEARE).
Ferro, G., Ramos, M. P., y Romero, C. A. (2023). Understanding smart grids. Serie Documentos de Trabajo 859, Universidad del CEMA (UCEMA) 11/2023.
Ferro, G, Castellano, A., Chaz Sardi, C., y Santacruz, R. (2021). Políticas Regulatorias. En Políticas públicas na Argentina e no Brasil (2003-2020): diferenças, convergências e desafios (Carlos E. Guanziroli, Andrea Castellano, Javier Ghibaudi y Rodrigo Perez Artica (organizadores). Niterói, Editorial da Universidade Federal Fluminense (EDUFF) y São Paulo Hucitec.
Gerchunoff, P., Greco, E. y Bondorevsky, D. (2003). Comienzos diversos, distintas trayectorias y final abierto: más de una década de privatizaciones en Argentina, 1990-2002. UN-CEPAL-ILPES, Serie Gestión Pública, LC/IP/L.226, LC/L.1885-P.
Hargreaves, J., Parr, M., Lay, H. y Weeks, M. (2006). The evolution of Ofwat’s Approach to Efficiency Analysis. Indepen Consulting. London, April.
Hochberg, M. y R. Poudineh (2021). The Brazilian electricity market architecture: An analysis of instruments and misalignments. Utilities Policy 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101267
Hogan, W., 1992. “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 4, pp. 211-242.
Holt, C. (2020). Wholesale Electricity Market Design for Decarbonization: Research Opportunities. Environmental Defense Fund Economics Discussion Paper Series, EDF EDP 20-02.
Joskow P. Y J. Tirole (2000). Transmission rights and market power on electric power networks. Rand Journal of Economics 31, pp. 450-487.
Joskow, P.L. (2008). Capacity Payments in Imperfect Electricity Markets: Need and Design. Utilities Policy 16(3):159–170. Ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.10.003.
Kakran, S., and Chanana, S. (2018). Smart Operations of Smart Grids Integrated with Distributed Generation: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 524-535.
Kirschen, D. S. Y Strbac, G. (2018). Fundamentals of Power System Economics, 2nd Edition. Wiley.
Kovacs, R., y Leverett, A. (1994). A load flow based method for calculating embedded, incremental and marginal cost of transmission capacity. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 9, 272-278.
Maurer, L. y Barroso, L. (2011). Electricity Auctions: An Overview of Efficient Practices. The World Bank.
Medina, J. M. (2024). Inversiones, tarifas y calidad de servicio de distribuidoras eléctricas nacionales según el cumplimiento del marco regulatorio. Tesis de Maestría en Economía, Universidad del CEMA.
Moreno,R., L. Barroso, H. Rudnick, S. Mocarquer y B. Bezerra (2010). Auction approaches of long-term contracts to ensure generation investment in electricity markets: Lessons from the Brazilian and Chilean experiences. Energy Policy 38:10, 5758-5769.
Navajas, Fernando (2023). Electricity Rate Structure Design in Latin America: Where Do We Stand? Where Should We Go? Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID-IDB), Technical Note 2766.
NERA (2019). Modelo Propuesto para el Sector Eléctrico Argentino. CAMMESA. Buenos Aires, diciembre.
Newbery, D. (2000). Privatization, restructuring, and regulation of network utilities. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Roy L. Nersesian, R. L. (2016). Energy Economics. Markets, History and Policy. Routledge.
Pérez Arriaga, I. J. (ed) (2013). Regulation of the Power Sector, Springer.
Petrecolla, D. y Romero, C. A. (2003). Desempeño, crisis y reformas en el sector eléctrico argentino: Lecciones para países en Desarrollo. UADE Textos de Discusión 50_2003, Instituto de Economía, Universidad Argentina de la Empresa.
Rego, E. y Parente, V. (2013). Brazilian experience in electricity auctions: Comparing outcomes from new and old energy auctions as well as the application of the hybrid Anglo-Dutch design. Energy Policy 55, 511-520.
Romero, C. A. (1998). Regulación e inversiones en el sector eléctrico argentino. CEPAL-CEER LC/BUE/R.232.
Rudnick, H. y Velasquez, C. (2018). Taking Stock of Wholesale Power Markets in Developing Countries. A Literature Review. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 8519.
Stoft, Steven (2002). Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. Wiley-IEEE Press
Schweppe, F C, Tabors, R D, Caraminis, M C, y Bohn, R E. (1988). Spot pricing of electricity. Kluwer
Silva-Rodriguez, L., Sanjab, A., Fumagalli, E., Virag, A. y Gibescu, M. (2022). Short term wholesale electricity market designs: A review of identified challenges and promising solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112228
Wilson, R. (2002). Architecture of Power Markets. Econometrica 70:4, 1299-1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00334
Wolak, F. A. (2021). Wholesale electricity market design. In Handbook on Electricity Markets. Edited by Jean-Michel Glachant, Paul L. Joskow, and Michael G. Pollitt. Chapter 4, pp. 73-110. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following terms:
Authors will conserve their copyright and guarantee the magazine the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International License that allows third parties to share the work as long as the author and first publication of this magazine are indicated.
Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements to distribute the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access)
