The duration of the rule “solve et repete” and the guarantee to effective judicial protection under current constitutional argentinian

Authors

  • Maximiliano Raijman Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Derecho.
  • Esteban Daniel Salcedo Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Derecho.

Keywords:

tax law, solve et repete, jurisprudence

Abstract

This work is an investigation that is part of seeking a definition of the rule “Solve et repete” as an institution of Tax Law and its treatment in positive law, with an analysis of the doctrine in general and particularized judgments of the Supreme Court Justice of the Nation and the Supreme Court of Justice of Cordoba, to conclude, by a criticism, its validity in the light of constitutional principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Maximiliano Raijman, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Derecho.

Abogado, Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios con Tesina en Derecho Tributario, Profesor Ayudante de Primera de la Cátedra “A” de Derecho Tributario, Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

Esteban Daniel Salcedo, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Derecho.

Abogado-Contador Público, Profesor Adjunto de la Cátedra “A” de Derecho Tributario, Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

Published

2012-04-16

How to Cite

Raijman, M., & Salcedo, E. D. (2012). The duration of the rule “solve et repete” and the guarantee to effective judicial protection under current constitutional argentinian. Revista De La Facultad De Derecho, 3(1). Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5976

Issue

Section

Doctrine and research