DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION

Authors

  • Juan M. Mocoroa

Keywords:

Supreme Court, Institutional system, Judicial Independence

Abstract

The article analyzes a reform proposal to the Supreme Court of Justice approved by the Senate. To do this, it reviews the main attempts to modify the integration of the Court in the history of our country. The criterion used to carry out this analysis is that the reforms were successful. That is, that the composition of the Court was effectively altered. With this scenario in mind, the work describes and criticizes the arguments that were used to approve the aforementioned project in the National Senate. Finally, the text concludes that these arguments are strategic, rather than institutional with a view to the better functioning of the Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan M. Mocoroa

Abogado (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba/UNC). Master en Global Rule of Law and Constitutional
Democracy (Universidad de Génova). Master en “Derecho y Argumentación Jurídica” (UNC); Master en “Derecho Administrativo” -medalla de oro por mejor promedio y reconocimiento al mérito por tesina final- (Universidad Austral). Docente de “Derecho Constitucional” (UNC) Este trabajo se enmarca en el proyecto de investigación Tipo I “La Constitución Nacional ante el Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Córdoba: Control de Constitucionalidad e Interpretación Constitucional” financiado por la Universidad Siglo 21.

Published

2023-11-15

How to Cite

Mocoroa, J. M. (2023). DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION. Revista De La Facultad De Derecho, 14(1), 251–270. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/43111

Issue

Section

Doctrine and research