LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE"

Authors

  • Leonardo Marcellino Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31054/2314.3061.v15.n1.45579

Keywords:

Patrimonial liability, Miscarriage of justice

Abstract

The responsibility of judicial officials has been, through jurisprudential and doctrinal criteria, the subject of a regulation that in fact generates a system of relative immunity with respect to the damages that those agents cause as a result of their functions. This immunity regime does not have legal regulatory support and violates constitutional principles such as those of equality before the
law and full reparation and that is why a new interpretation of these parameters or jurisprudential requirements is justified so that they adjust to the regime regulations contemplated by the Civil and Commercial Code for all public agents in art. 1766, within which the personnel of the Judicial Branch must be included and also the current reality where primacy is given to the right to reparation.

Author Biography

  • Leonardo Marcellino, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

    Abogado (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba / UNC). Magíster en Derecho y Argumentación (UNC). Doctor en Derecho y Ciencias Sociales (UNC). Profesor Titular en la asignatura Privado VIII (Derecho de Daños) e Investigador, Universidad Siglo 21. Docente Profesor Ayudante en la asignatura Privado VII (Derecho de Daños), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Miembro del Instituto de Derecho Civil de la Academia de Derecho Córdoba. E-mail: leonardo.marcellino@unc.edu.ar

Downloads

Published

2024-07-03

Issue

Section

Doctrine and research

How to Cite

LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SO-CALLED "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE". (2024). Revista De La Facultad De Derecho, 15(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.31054/2314.3061.v15.n1.45579