DEBATES ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUSTICE: STRATEGIC ARGUMENTS, TRIVIALIZATION OF INSTITUTIONS AND DEMOCRATIC EROSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31054/2314.3061.v14.n1.43111Keywords:
Supreme Court, Institutional system, Judicial IndependenceAbstract
The article analyzes a reform proposal to the Supreme Court of Justice approved by the Senate. To do this, it reviews the main attempts to modify the integration of the Court in the history of our country. The criterion used to carry out this analysis is that the reforms were successful. That is, that the composition of the Court was effectively altered. With this scenario in mind, the work describes and criticizes the arguments that were used to approve the aforementioned project in the National Senate. Finally, the text concludes that these arguments are strategic, rather than institutional with a view to the better functioning of the Court.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Facultad de Derecho. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
La publicación del artículo implica la donación de los derechos de autor a la Facultad de Derecho, conservando el autor su derecho a utilizar el artículo en publicaciones de su autoría o páginas web referidas a su trayectoria. Para el caso de otro tipo de publicaciones, antes de su utilización, deberá obtener autorización de la facultad.
