ANALYSIS OF THE BEHAVIOR OF non CONVENtional STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES iN PROJECTS in SEISMIC AREAS

Authors

  • Silvina Ines Pradós Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
  • Yohana Elizabeth Cicaré Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
  • Katya LlopJoekes Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59047/2469.0724.v2.n2.16515

Keywords:

Structural design, Earthquake structure, Architecture

Abstract

The structural challenges that arise from the current architectural trends motivate us to reflect on the skills or criteria acquired during the degree of architecture, when selecting the tools and methodologies of analysis to apply for their correct evaluation. This turns especially evident with the study of seismic mechanisms using simplified methods suchs as the static equivalent proposed by the regulation for buildings   located in areas with seismic risks. Simplified analysis procedures are tools for checking for predictable structural behavior, according to design parameters, over the life of a building and its level of approximation to actual behavior will always depend on the criteria of the designer. In the following text, a building is analyzed showing the scope of the methods learned during the academic training of the architect.

References

Applied Technology Council (1996) Sismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. California.

Arnold C., Reitherman R. (1987) Configuración y diseño sísmico de edificios, México, Limusa.

Material didáctico de la cátedra de Estructuras III FAUD-UNC (2014) El edificio en altura, Córdoba,

Publicación digital http://uncavim10.unc.edu.ar/course/view.php?id=43&section=14

Moisset, D. (1999) Intuición y Razonamiento en el Diseño Estructural, Córdoba, Argentina, Ed.

Ingreso.

Moisset, D., Goytia, N. (2002) Diseñar con la Estructura. Córdoba, Argentina, Ed. Ingreso.

NILSON, A. (2001) Diseño de estructuras de concreto. Ed. Mc Graw Hill

Paulay T.; Priestley N. (1992) Sismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings

Reboredo, A. (2000) Manual de construcción sismo resistente. UNC

Reglamento INPRES-CIRSOC 103 – Parte I (Julio 2013) Reglamento Argentino para construcciones

sismorresistentes.

Reglamento CIRSOC 201 (2005) Reglamento Argentino de estructuras de hormigón.

Torroja Miret, E. (2000) Razón y ser de los tipos estructurales. 10° Ed. Madrid, España, Consejo

Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Construcción Eduardo Torroja.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-29

Issue

Section

EXPERIENCIAS DIDÁCTICAS

How to Cite

ANALYSIS OF THE BEHAVIOR OF non CONVENtional STRUCTURAL TYPOLOGIES iN PROJECTS in SEISMIC AREAS. (2016). PENSUM, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.59047/2469.0724.v2.n2.16515