The hypothesis of the hidden painting

Authors

  • Derek Humphreys Maître de Conférences en Psychopathologie Clinique et Psychanalyse UTRPP – EA 3413 / Université Paris 13 - Sorbonne Paris Cité

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31056/2250.5415.v8.n2.22762

Keywords:

Representability, Image/Imaginary, Dream, Phantasy, Collective inscription of the trauma

Abstract

Reality, experience, are of the order of the discontinuous, the fragmented. From these pieces of perception, the sequence of images-in-movement is used to organize a narrative, a script that disguises the horror of the gaze, the real behind the continuity. Imaginary or fantasy, which status should we give to these sequences? Playing with speed and with movement, the filmic production of David Lynch restores disarticulated fantasmatic series, referring to the original meaning of fantasm as an iconic image. On the other hand, Raul Ruiz seems to make rebuffs from the phantasmal images of Klossowsky, revealing the missing element in the set of empty and suspended icons we find in the “hypothesis of the stolen painting”. Lure or necessity, the construction of an image-movement as the basis of a narrative allows to integrate the experience, including that of trauma, deploying also instances of social recognition, an individual novel, collective myths, of a culture and a history. It is from this idea on the status of the iconic image in cinema, and its link to the fantasy and the civilizing tale, that we will analyze the absent character in Haneke’s Hidden (2005).

References

David-Ménard, M. Corps et langage en psychanalyse, op.cit.

Freud, S. (1895). Entwurf einer Psychologie IN: Gesammelte werke, Nachtragsband. Frankfurt am Main, S. Fisher, 1987, p. 389. En M. David-Ménard. Corps et langage en psychanalyse. Paris, Campagne Première, 2014.

Freud, S. (1986) Carta a Fliess del 6.12.1896. IN : Naissance de la psychanalyse, Paris, PUF 1973, p. 153-160 (trad. libre). J. Lacan. Le séminaire livre 7, L’Ethique de la psychanalyse (1959-1960). Paris, Seuil (trad. libre).

Freud, S. (1900). La interpretación de los sueños. Aparece citada respectivamente la traducción de L. Lopez-Ballesteros y Torres (O.C., Tomo I, Madrid, 1948, p. 393-397), y la de J.L. Echeverry (Amorrortu IV, p. 285-286). étation du rêve (traduction de J.P. Lefebvre). Paris, Seuil 2010, pp. 319-320.

Freud, S. (1910). Un recuerdo infantil de Leonardo da Vinci. 8 S. Freud, la interpretación de los sueños, OC. Tomo 1, Madrid, p. 517.

Humphreys, D. (1999). David Lynch: Stereo-Unheimlichkeit, Objetos Caídos No. 4, p.27-42, Santiago, ed. Universidad Diego Portales.

Lacan, J. (1968) L’acte. Seminario inédito, clase del 6.3.1968, trad. libre.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-02

How to Cite

The hypothesis of the hidden painting. (2018). Ética Y Cine Journal, 8(2), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.31056/2250.5415.v8.n2.22762