La prueba del daño moral.

Main Article Content

Nicolás Boncini

Abstract

Reflecting on the nature of moral harm can be a quite complex issue, as it poses the need to inquire into the characteristics that encompass and define this type of entity that has suffered a damage capable of being repaired or compensated. This analysis requires, as an initial matter, going back to the very nature of things that exist, because for things, entities, to be harmed, they must first exist; this is natural and obvious. Only after we can identify the nature of their existence, we will be in a position to progress in the analysis of the causes and conditions that allow us to verify the existence of harm or damage from which compensation for the accused may or may not arise. This implies investigating the proof of moral harm, its means, requirements, and possibilities. In modern societies, trust in the judicial process is increasingly grounded and dependent on the seriousness and reasonability of evidence; therefore, paying attention to the best resources or possibilities for substantiating facts will result in a better justice system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Boncini, N. (2024). La prueba del daño moral. Estudios Del Centro, 1(2), 82–96. Retrieved from https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/estudioscentro/article/view/44168
Section
Doctrina Nacional
Author Biography

Nicolás Boncini, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

Abogado (UNC, 2003), Especialista en Derecho Laboral (UNC, UCC, 2008), Especialista en Derecho Procesal (UNC 2010), Adscripto Derecho Privado II (UNC, 2011), Magister en Derecho y Argumentación Jurídica (UNC, 2023).

References

ATIENZA Manuel, (2014): Curso de argumentación jurídica. Madrid, España: Ed. Trotta.

TARUFFO Michelle, (2011), La prueba de los hechos. Madrid, España: Ed. Trotta.

PIZARRO Daniel y VALLESPINOS Carlos G., (2018), Tratado de responsabilidad civil, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Ed Rubinzal Culzoni.

GASCÓN ABELLÁN Marina, (2010), Los hechos en el derecho, Barcelona, España, Ed Marcial Pons.

HARRE Rom, (2002), Cognitive Sicence, A Philophical introduccion, SAGE, Londres, Inglaterra. (traduccion de prof Nicolas Venturelli)

GONZÁLEZ LAGIER Daniel, (2013), Quaestio facti (Ensayos sobre prueba, causalidad y acción), Barcelona, España, Ed Marcial Pons.

GARCÍA MORENTE Manuel, (2013), Lecciones preliminares de filosofía, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Ed Losada.

ZAVALA DE GONZÁLEZ Matilde, (1996), Resarcimiento de daños, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Ed Hammurabi tomo 2a.

BUSTAMANTE ALSINA Jorge, (1997), Teoría general de la responsabilidad civil, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Ed Abeledo Perrot.

CHURCHLAND Paul, (1992), Materia y Conciencia, Barcelona, España, Ed Gedisa.

BUNGE Mario, (2013), La ciencia, su método y la filosofía, Madrid, España, Ed Leer.

JUÁREZ FERRER Martin, (2017), Cuantificación del daño, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Ed La Ley.

COSACOV Eduardo, (2018), Introducción a la Psicología, Córdoba, Argentina, Ed Brujas.