Correlation analysis between morphometric variables of the lower third molar and mandibular measurements obtained from panoramic X-rays

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31051/1852.8023.v14.n1.35674

Keywords:

Dental Anatomy; Third Molar; Mandibular Morphometry.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the correlation between lower third molar measurements and mandible measures.

Methods: In this descriptive study were analyzed the following lower third molar diameters and lengths: occlusal-apical length (oal), buccal-occlusal-cervical length (bocl), lingual-occlusal-cervical length (locl), mesial-distal diameter (mdd) and buccal-lingual diameter (bld). On the other hand, the mandible measures, obtained from digital panoramic X-rays images (n=26) using software applications, included: mandible's ramus height (rh), width (rw) and length (rl), body's length (bl) and condyle's length (cl). For the statistical analysis of these variables, mean and SEM were calculated for each of them and tested for correlation using Pearson's test (p<0.05).

Results: Mandible measures (mm) obtained were: rh= 61.4±1.7, rw= 37.8±1.9, rl= 44.1±1.5, bl= 113.6±2.3, cl= 22.7±0.6, while the third molar morphometric measures (mm) were: oal= 17.9±0.3, bocl= 7.6±0.1, locl= 6.6±0.1, mdd= 11.1±0.2 and bld= 9.9±0.1. Univariate significant correlations were observed between rw and bld (r=0.64), rh and oal (r= 0.76), bl and mdd (r=0.57). Cross-wise measures of the mandible and molar tend to correlate with each other as also observed for the length-wise measures.

 Conclusions: The correlation found between third molar morphometry and mandible's measures would be useful to estimate third molar morphometrics from panoramic X-ray. This would help plan the surgical removal of the molar.

Author Biographies

  • Pablo W. Trinks, Cátedra de Anatomía. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Marcelo T. de Alvear 2142. CABA.

    Profesor Adjunto.

  • Mariano A. R. Amer, Cátedra de Anatomía, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Marcelo T. de Alvear 2142. CABA Buenos Aires

     

    Profesor Titular

  • Federico Stolbizer, Cátedra de Cirugía y Traumatología Bucomaxilofacial II. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Marcelo T. de Alvear 2142. CABA.

    Profesor Titular

  • Gabriel A. Sanchez, Cátedra de Biofísica y Bioestadística. Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Marcelo T. de Alvear 2142. CABA.

    Profesor Titular

References

Ali AS, Benton JA, Yates JM. 2018. Risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury with coronectomy vs surgical extraction of mandibular third molars-A comparison of two techniques and review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil 45(3): 250-257.

Araujo GTT, Peralta-Mamani M, Silva AFMD, Rubira CMF, Honório HM, Rubira-Bullen IRF. 2019. Influence of cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography on the surgical technique of third molar removal: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(10): 1340-1347.

Arslan ZB, Demir H, Berker Yildiz D, Yasar F. 2020. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography and ultrasonography in detecting periapical lesions using periapical radiography as a gold standard. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. Sep. 1;49(6): 20190290.

Candotto V, Oberti L, Gabrione F, Scarano A, Rossi D, Romano M. 2019. Complication in third molar extractions. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 33(3 Suppl. 1): 169-172.

Carter K, Worthington S. 2016. Predictors of Third Molar Impaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res 95(3):267-76.

Cervera-Espert J, Pérez-Martínez S, Cervera-Ballester J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. 2016. Coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21(4): 505-13.

Cervino G, Cicciù M, Biondi A, Bocchieri S, Herford AS, Laino L, Fiorillo L. 2019. Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Third Molar Extraction: Systematic Review of Recent Data. Antibiotics (Basel) 8(2): 53.

Cho H, Lynham AJ, Hsu E. 2017. Postoperative interventions to reduce inflammatory complications after third molar surgery: review of the current evidence. Aust Dent J 62(4):412-419.

Clé-Ovejero A, Sánchez-Torres A, Camps-Font O, Gay-Escoda C, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E. 2017. Does 3-dimensional imaging of the third molar reduce the risk of experiencing inferior alveolar nerve injury owing to extraction?: A meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 148(8): 575-583.

Dachi SF, Howell FV. 1961. Exodontia. A survey of 3,874 routine ful-mouth radiographs. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 14: 1165-1169.

Del Lhano NC, Ribeiro RA, Martins CC, Assis NMSP, Devito KL. 2019. Panoramic versus CBCT used to reduce inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 49(4): 20190265.

Duarte-Rodrigues L, Miranda EFP, Souza TO, de Paiva HN, Falci SGM, Galvão EL. 2018. Third molar removal and its impact on quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res 27(10): 2477-2489.

Falci SGM, Lima TC, Martins CC, Santos CRRD, Pinheiro MLP. 2017. Preemptive Effect of Dexamethasone in Third-Molar Surgery: A Meta-Analysis. Anesth Prog. 64(3): 136-143.

Giovacchini F, Paradiso D, Bensi C, Belli S, Lomurno G, Tullio A. 2018. Association between third molar and mandibular angle fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 46(4): 558-565.

Isiordia-Espinoza MA, Aragon-Martinez OH, Bollogna-Molina RE, Alonso-Castro ÁJ. 2018. Infection, Alveolar Osteitis, and Adverse Effects Using Metronidazole in Healthy Patients Undergoing Third Molar Surgery: A Meta-analysis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 17(2): 142-149.

KalaiSelvan S, Ganesh SKN, Natesh P, Moorthy MS, Niazi TM, Babu SS. 2020. Prevalence and Pattern of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: An Institution-based Retrospective Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 12(Suppl 1): S462-S467.

Kieser JA, Groeneveld HT. 1988. Allometric relations of teeth and jaws in man. Am J Phys Anthropol 77(1):57-67.

Leung YY. 2019. Management and prevention of third molar surgery-related trigeminal nerve injury: time for a rethink. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(5): 233-240.

Liu J, Hua C, Pan J, Han B, Tang X. 2018. Piezosurgery vs conventional rotary instrument in the third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Dent Sci 13(4): 342-349.

Menon RK, Gopinath D, Li KY, Leung YY, Botelho MG. 2019. Does the use of amoxicillin/amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in third molar surgery reduce the risk of postoperative infection? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(2): 263-273.

Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Ylipaavalniemi P, Ritomaa I. 1985. Status of the third molars in the 20 to 21-year-old Finnish University Population. J Am Coll Health 34: 127-129.

Ngeow WC, Lim D. 2016. Do Corticosteroids Still Have a Role in the Management of Third Molar Surgery? Adv Ther 33(7): 1105-39.

Teshome A. 2017. The efficacy of chlorhexidine gel in the prevention of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 17(1): 82.

Townsend GC, Brown T. 1978. Heritability of permanent tooth size. Am J Phys Anthropol 49:497–504.

Uribe Restrepo GA. Fundamentos de Odontología. Ortodoncia: teoría y clínica. Seg. Edición. CIB. 2010. p. 177-180.

Xiang X, Shi P, Zhang P, Shen J, Kang J. 2019. Impact of platelet-rich fibrin on mandibular third molar surgery recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 19(1): 163.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-25

Issue

Section

Original Communications

How to Cite

Correlation analysis between morphometric variables of the lower third molar and mandibular measurements obtained from panoramic X-rays. (2022). Revista Argentina De Anatomía Clínica (Argentine Journal of Clinical Anatomy), 14(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.31051/1852.8023.v14.n1.35674