ANATOMICAL STUDY OF THE MORPHOMETRY OF THE TIBIAL AND FEMORAL ATTACHMENT SITES OF THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; Estudio anatómico de la morfometría de los sitios de inserción tibial y femoral del ligamento cruzado posterior.

Authors

  • Paul Inalegwu Iyaji 1. Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 2. Human Anatomy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
  • Roger Williams Soames 1. Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31051/1852.8023.v8.n3.15240

Keywords:

Posterior cruciate ligament, anterolateral bundle, posteromedial bundle, anatomic reconstruction, Ligamento cruzado posterior, tendón anterolateral, tendón posteromedial, reconstruction anatómica

Abstract

, Although later isolated injuries cruciate of the ligament (PCL) are managed through non-operative rehabilitation, reconstruction is becoming ITS anatomic increasingly important. This study Provides Information Regarding the position and variability of Its tibial attachment sites, dimensions of the femoral insertions, Between These Comparing males and females, and Between right and left knees. Thirty one cadaveric knees (15 right, 16 left) from nine female and seven male cadavers ( mean age 77 years) Were Examined. The PCL footprint Which was Identified from the mean length and width of the tibial anterolateral (AL) and posteromedial (PM) 8.7 and 10.9 mm Were bundles, and 7.3 and 13.44mm respectively. The mean length and width of the tibial footprint in males and females 10.2 and 10.3 mm Were, and 7.7 and 11.4 mm for the AL bundle and 8.2 and 14.2 mm and 12.9 mm and 6.7 for the PM bundle respectively. The mean anatomical position of the AL and 51.0% Were PM bundles and 50.0% of the mediolateral diameter of the tibial plateau. The mean lengths and widths of the PCL femoral attachment Were 9.4 mm and 12.8 for the AL bundle and 7.5 and 11.4 mm for the PM bundle, with the AL bundle attachment being Significantly larger (P = 0.034) in evils. No Difference between right and left knees Were Observed . The data presented here will aid in making decisions to Achieve Appropriate anatomic PCL reconstruction.

, Although isolated lesions of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) are Treated by non-operative rehabilitation, anatomical reconstruction've Become increasingly important. This study Provides information on the position and variability of the binding sites of the tibia, the dimensions of the femoral insertions, Comparing them Between the sexes, and Between the right and left knee. They Were Examined thirty-one (15 right and 16 left knees) of 9 women and 7 dead bodies of males (mean age 77 years). Brand LCP was Identified from the length and width anterolateral and posteromedial (PM) of the tibia (AL) Were the results 8.7 and 10.9 mm, and 7.3 and 13.44mm respectively. The average length and width of the mark of the tibia in the male and female Were 10.2 and 10.3 mm and 7.7 mm and 11.4 for fiber AL, 8.2 and 14.2 mm and 6.7 mm and 12.9 for PM, respectively fiber. The average anatomical position of the tendons AL and PM Were 51.0% and 50.0% of the mediolateral diameter of the tibial plateau. Half lengths and widths of the PCL femoral insertion Were 9.4 and 12.8 mm for the tendon AL and 7.5 and 11.4 mm for the PM tendon, tendon insertion site AL was Significantly higher (P = 0.034) in men. no Difference Between the right and left Knees Were Observed. The data presented here will help in the decision-PCL suitable for anatomical reconstruction decisions.

 

Author Biography

  • Paul Inalegwu Iyaji, 1. Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 2. Human Anatomy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

    Present address:

    Anatomy Department

    Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences

    Bingham University

    Karu, Nasarawa State

    Nigeria

    West Africa.

    Email: iyaji_paulreg@yahoo.com ; p.iyaji@dundee.ac.uk

    Telephone: 2348036288696, 2348174383489

References

Anderson CJ, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, Laprade RF. 2012. Arthroscopically pertinent anatomy of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg - Series A 94: 1936-1945

Chandrasekaran S, Ma D, Scarvell JM, Woods KR, Smith PN. 2012. A review of the anatomical, biomechanical and kinematic findings of posterior cruciate ligament injury with respect to non-operative management. Knee 19: 738-745

Christel P. 2003. Basic principles for surgical reconstruction of the PCL in chronic posterior knee instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11: 289-296

Colvin AC, Meislin, RJ. 2009. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete diagnosis and treatment. Bull NYU Hosp for Joint Dis 67: 45-51

Cosgarea AJ, Jay PR. 2001. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9: 297-307

Cury RPL, Severino NR, Camargo OPA, Aihara T, Neto LVB, Goarayeb DN. 2011. Femoral insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament: an antomical study. Rev Bras Ortop 46(5): 591-595

Dandy DJ, Pusey RJ. 1982. The long-term results of unrepaired tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg- Series B 64: 92-94

Dargel J, Pohl P, Tzikaras P, Koebke J. 2006. Morphometric side-to-side differences in human cruciate ligament insertions. Surg Radiol Anat 28: 398-402

Edwards A, Bull AMJ, Amis AA. 2007. The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament - Part 1: tibial attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc15: 1414-1421

Fanelli GC, Orcutt DR, Edson CJ. 2005. The multiple-ligament injured knee: evaluation, treatment, and results. Arthroscopy - J Arthrosc Rel Surg21: 471-486

Gali JC, Oliveira HCDS, Lisboa BCB, Dias BD, Casimiro FDG, Caetano EB. 2013. Tibial insertions of the posterior cruciate ligament: topographic anatomy and morphometric study. Rev Bras Ortop 48: 263-267

Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Al Monajem ARS. 1975. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop 106: 216-231

Greiner P, Magnussen RA, Lustig S, Demey G, Neyret P, Servien E. 2011. Computed tomography evaluation of the femoral and tibial attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc19: 1876-1883

Harner CD, Goo HB, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Kashiwaguchi S, Woo SLY. 1999. Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 15: 741-749

Harner CD, Robert Giffin J, Vogrin TM, Woo SLY. 2001. Anatomy and biomechanics of the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner. Op Tech Sports Med9: 39-46

Hoher J, Scheffler S, Weiler A. 2003. Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 11: 297-306

Li G, Papannagari R, Li M, Bingham J, Nha KW, Allred D, Gill T. 2008. Effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on in vivo translation and rotation of the knee during weightbearing flexion. Am J Sports Med 36: 474-479

Lopes Jr. OV, Ferretti M, Shen W, Ekdahl M, Smolinski P, Fu FH. 2008. Topography of the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. JBone Joint Surg- Series A, 90: 249-255

Osti M, Tschann P, Künzel KH, Benedetto KP. 2012. Anatomic characteristics and radiographic references of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med40: 1558-1563

Petersen W, Zantop T, Tillmann B. 2006. Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament as well as the posterolateral and posteromedial structures. Arthroskopie 19: 198-206

Schulz MS, Russe K, Weiler A, Eichhorn HJ, Strobel HJ. 2003. Epidemiology of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Arch of Orthop Trauma Surg 123: 186-191

Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV. 1999. The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 27: 276-283

Tajima G, Nozaki M, Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJM, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH. 2009. Morphology of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg- Series A 91: 859-866

Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M, Suzuki D, Nagano A. 2006. Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc14: 1055-1059

Wind WM Jr, Bergfeld JA, Parker RD. 2004. Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: revisited. Am J Sports Med 32: 1765-1775

Downloads

Published

2016-11-23

Issue

Section

Original Communications

How to Cite

ANATOMICAL STUDY OF THE MORPHOMETRY OF THE TIBIAL AND FEMORAL ATTACHMENT SITES OF THE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; Estudio anatómico de la morfometría de los sitios de inserción tibial y femoral del ligamento cruzado posterior. (2016). Revista Argentina De Anatomía Clínica (Argentine Journal of Clinical Anatomy), 8(3), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.31051/1852.8023.v8.n3.15240