Non-autologous human bone graft applied to upper maxillary sinus elevation
Palavras-chave:
Human bone graft, Dental implant, Sinus elevationResumo
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of non-autogenous human bone using the maxillary sinus floor elevation technique to create favorable conditions for the placement of dental implants. Longitudinal clinical study of partially edentulous patients of both genders (included in this study n = 11), older than 18 years. The data were recorded in three time periods: a) at the time of operation: b) control at 7 days, c) control at 180 days, these last two postoperative. The human bone grafts used were lyophilized and irradiated, with a particle size of 0.2 and 1 mm, manufactured by the Hemoderivatives of the National University of Córdoba. The increase in bone tissue was measured by digital orthopantomography, as the distance obtained between the lower basal edge and the resulting alveolar ridge. The population was composed of 8 women and 3 men. The increase in bone reached, at 7 and 180 days, was observed radiographically. There was a significant increase in the mean values of bone mm. Variations were 4-8 mm at the time of operation at mean values of ? 14 mm at 7 and 180 days after surgery.
The results indicate that lyophilized human bone can be considered an alternative to bone grafts of animal origin or those of patients.
Referências
1. Mangano C, Scarano A, Perrotti V., Iezzi G, Piattelli A. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine derived hydroxyapatite: comparative clinical and histological study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2007; 22: 980–986.
2. Murthy A.S. Lehman J.A. Secondary alveolar bone grafting:An outcome analysis. Can J Plast Surg. 2006;14: 172–4.
3. Ballini A, Cantore S, Capodiferro S, GrassiFR. Esterified Hyaluronic Acid and Autologous Bone in the Surgical Correction of the Infra-Bone Defects. Int J Med Sci. 2009; 6: 65–71.
4. Brand RA. Repair of bone in the presence of aseptic necrosis resulting from fractures, transplantations and vascular obstruction. ClinOrthopRelat Res. 2008; 466:1020-1. 5. Huh JB, Park CK, Kim SE, Shim KM, Choi KH, Kim SJ, Shim JS, Shin SW. Alveolar ridge augmentation using anodized implant coated with Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod. 2011; 112:42-9.doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.09.063. 6. Funaki K, Takahashi T, Yamuchi K.Horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: comparison with a bone-splitting method in a dog model. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol Oral RadilEndod. 2009; 107:350-358.doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.005.
7. Gruber R, Stadlinger B, Terheyden H. Cell-to-cell communication in guided bone regeneration: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016. doi: 10.1111/clr.12929.
8. Pollock R, Alcelik I, Bhatia A, Chuter CG, Kiran L, Budithi C and Krishna, M. Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques. Eur Spine J. 200;17: 845-52.
9. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin N Am 1986; 30:207–229.
10. Bowen-Antolín A, Pascua-García MT, Nasimi A. Infections in implantology: From prophylaxis to treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.2007; 12(4):E323-30.
11. Gutiérrez JL, Bagán JV, Bascones A, LlamasR, Llena J, Morales A, Noguero lB, Planells P, Prieto J, Salmerón JI. Consensus document on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in dental surgery and procedures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006; 11:E188-E205.
12. Poveda-Roda R, Bagán JV, Sanchis-Bielsa JM, Carbonell-Pastor E. Antibiotic use indental practice.Areview. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007; 12:E186-92.
13. Moreno Vázquez JC, González de Rivera AS, Serrano Gil H, Santamaria Mifsut R. Complication Rate in 200 Consecutive Sinus Lift Procedures: Guidelines for PreventionandTreatment.J Oral MaxillofacSurg.2014; 72:892-901.
14. Cassetta M, Perrotti V, Calasso S, Piattelli A, Sinjari B, Iezzi G. Bone formation in sinus augmentation procedures using autologous bone, porcine bone, and a 50: 50 mixture: a human clinical and histological evaluation at 2 months. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(10):1180-4
15. Pistilli R, Felice P, Piatelli M, Nisii A, Barausse C, Esposito M.Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(2):153-71.
16. Gorla LF, Spin-Neto R, Boos FB, Pereira Rdos S, Garcia-Junior IR, Hochuli-Vieira E. Use of autogenous bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate in maxillary sinus lifting: a prospective, randomized, volumetric computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(12):1486-91.
17. Rickert D, Slater JJ, Meijer HJ, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Maxillary sinus lift with solely autogenous bone compared to a combination of autogenous bone and growth factors or (solely) bone substitutes. A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41(2):160-7.
18. Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft in animals: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41(1):114-20
19. Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Anorganic bovine bone (ABB) vs. autologous bone (AB) plus ABB in maxillary sinus grafting. A prospective non-randomized clinical and histomorphometrical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(9):1043-50
20. Thomas MV, Puleo DA. Infection, inflammation, and bone regeneration: a paradoxical relationship. J Dent Res. 2011; 90(9):1052–61.
21. Lee HJ, Choi BH, Jung JH, Zhu SJ, Lee SH, Huh JY, You TM, Li J. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using autogenous bone grafts and platelet-enriched fibrin glue with simultaneous implant placement. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(3):329–33.
22. Schlegel KA, Zimmermann R, Thorwarth M, Neukam FW, Klongnoi B, Nkenke E, Felszeghy E. Sinus floor elevation using autogenous bone or bone substitute combined with platelet-rich plasma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104(3):e15–25.
23. Raja SV. Management of the posterior maxilla with sinus lift: Review of techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67(8):1730-4.
24. Peng W, Kim IK, Cho HY, Pae SP, Jung BS, Cho HW, Seo JH. Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 39(6):274-82.
25. Cha HS, Kim JW, Hwang JH, Ahn KM. Frequency of bone graft in implant surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar 31; 38(1):19.
26. Netto HD, Miranda Chaves MD, Aatrstrup B, Guerra R, Olate S. Bone Formation in Maxillary Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Bone Graft at 2 and 6 Months. Int J Morphol. 2016; 34(3):1069-1075.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) después del su publicación en la revista, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
