Comparative analysis of different precision retainer systems: part 2

Authors

  • Dib et al

Keywords:

Prótesis, Parcial, Removible, Ataches, Deformación, Strain Gauge

Abstract

The presence of a free end a removable partial dentures involves a major problem in the clinic. In fact, it is known that there is difficulty in treating multiplying by 2.5 the risk of complications. The gaps without posterior abutment are difficult to restore later, require a support tooth and mucosa. The oral mucosa and the ligament periodontal of the abutments teeth respond differently to the loads. This difference in behavior of teeth and mucosa is what has led to the design of removable partial dentures to be rigid or resilient characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the deformation of different extra coronary attachments systems; and to determine through strain gauge analysis the loads that each system causes on the most distal pillar elements that these attachments carry. An experimental model of the partially edentulous upper maxilla of Kennedy class I was constructed to measure the deformation that occurs in the most distal dental elements. Three extra coronary precision attachments were analyzed: rod attachment (RA), strategy (SA), and Anker system (AS) to determine and compare their behavior in later bilateral teeth (Kennedy class I) in the upper jaw. The results showed that at the deformation and at a load of 10 dan (decanewton), AS attachments presented, less deformation in the distal elements carrying said attachments while RA presented the highest values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beaumont AJ. An overview of esthetics with removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2002; 33:747-55.

Mc Cord JF, Grey NJA, Winstanley R, Johnson A. A clinical overview of Removable Partial Dentures. Dental Update. Removable Prosthodontics. 2017; 29(10).

Besfort JN, Sutton AF. Aesthetic possibilities in removable prosthodontics. Part 1: the aesthetic spectrum from perfect to personal. Br Dent J. 2018 12; 224(1):15-19.

Mallat Desplats E, Keogh T: Elementos que integran la prótesis removible: Prótesis Parcial Removible, clínica y laboratorio. Ed. HarcourtBrace, España, 1998, pp 3-7; 83-87.

Kratochvil FJ, Thompson WD, Caputo AA. Photoelastic analisys of stress patterns on teeth and bone with attachment retainers for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46: 21-8.

Chou TM, Caputo AA, Moore DJ, Xiao B. Photoelastic analisys and comparison of force-transmission characteristics of intracoronal attachments with clasp distal-extension removal partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 313-9.

Altay OT, Tsolka P, Preiskel HW. Abutment teeth with extracoronal attachments: the effects of splinting on abutment tooth movement. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3: 441-8.

Aydinlik E, Dayangac B, Celik E. Effect of splinting on abutment tooth movement. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 477-480.

Ling YH, Zhang FQ, Yu LN.Effect of stress distribution of support tissues using hinge extracoronal attachment prostheses. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2004; 13:118

Zheng YL, Chen L, Zhang FQ, Wang CT. Effect of the abutment with reduced periodontal support on stress distribution of support tissue. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 1999; 8:104-6.

Zheng YL, Chen L, Zhang FQ, Wang CT. Effect of the number of splinted abutments on stress distribution of support tissue. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 1999; 8:101-3.

Cañedo P. Revisión de los estudios biomecánicos in vitro y longitudinales, aplicados a la utilización de elementos de unión en prótesis combinada a un extremo libre distal. Quintessence (ed. esp.) 2004; 17:216-224.

Wright KWJ, Yetram AL. Reactive force distributions for teeth when loaded singly and when used as fixed partial denture abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42-411.

Arteagoitia I, Sabrás F, San Martín JA. Prótesis parciales removibles retenidas mediante anclajes. Estudio a largo plazo de los anclajes Roach y Mini dalbo. RCOE 2001; 5:72.

Wills DJ, Manderson RD. Biomechanical aspects of the support of partial dentures. Journal of Dentistry 1977; 5:310-18.

Consulta web 2015: “Interfase del Strain Gauge de presión” [en línea]. Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile. http://macul.ciencias.uchile.cl/~rferrer/aerotot/node6.html.

Riddle M, MacDermid-Watts K, Holland S, Mc Dermid JC, Lalone E. Wearable strain gauge based technologu measures manual tactile forces during the activities of daily living. J Rehablil Assist Technol Eng. 2018; 5:205-56.

El Charkawi HG, Wakad MT. Effect of splinting load distribution of extracoronal attachment with distal extension prosthesis in vitro. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 315-20.

Shillingburg H., Hobo S., Whitsett Lowell. Principios de Tallado. Fundamentos de tallado en Prostodoncia Fija. México: La Prensa Médica Mexicana, 1990:67-83.

Lindeman DE, Moore RN. Measurement of intraoral muscle forces during functional exercises. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97(4):289-300.

El Charkawi HG, Goodkind RJ, DeLong R, Douglas WH. The effect of the resilient-layer distal-extension partial denture on movement of the abutment teeth: A new methodology. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:622-30.

Wang Y, Mi N, Qing F, Liu F, Chen J. Surface stress analysis of distal extension removable partial denture retained with two types of semi-precision attachments. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2001; 19:283-6.

Jin X, Sato M, Nishiyama A, Ohyama T. Influence of loading positions of mandibular unilateral distal extension removable partial dentures on movements of abutment tooth and denture base. J Med Dent Sci 2004; 51:155-63.

Morton D, Stanford CM, Aquilino SA. Evaluation of resilient abutment components on measured strain using dynamic loading conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:46-51.

Howel AW, Manley RS. An electronic Strain Gauge for measuring oral forces. J Dent Res 1948; 27:705.

Shohet H. Relative magnitudes of stress on abutment teeth with different retainers. J.Prosthet Dent 1969; 21:267-282.

Stebner CM. Use of research for Better Dental Service.

J.A.D.A. 1960; 60:608-614.

Mühlemann HR. Tooth mobility changes through artificial trauma. J.Periodont. 1954; 25:202

Mühleman HR, Herzog H. Tooth movility and microscopic tissue changes produced by experimental occlusal trauma. Helvet. Odont. Acta 1961; 5:33-39.

Burns DR, Ward JE. A review of attachment for removable partial denture desing: part 1. Clasification and selection. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3(1):98-102.

Cecconi BT,Kaiser G,Rahe A. Stressbreakers and the removable partial denture.J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:145-51.

Berg T, Caputo AA. Load transfer by a maxillary distal-extension removable partial denture with cap and ring extracoronal attachments. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:784-9.

Selva EJ, Labaig C, Mañes JF, Martínez A. Análisis fotoelástico de dos sistemas retentivos en prótesis parcial removible. Quintessence Int (ed. esp.) 1994; 7:169-74.

Berg T, Caputo AA. Maxillary distal-extension removable partial denture abutments with reduced periodontal support. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70:245-50.

Published

2020-08-21