Relationship between the angulation of temporary anchoring devices and their displacement. Experimental study
Keywords:
mini-implant, anchorage, stabilityAbstract
The purpose of this study is to assess how the insertion angle influence the stability mini-implant when loaded with 200 cNe in this study, 2 mini-screws were implanted in male rabbits’ (n=25) tibia in a 6 weeks interval between the first one and the second one. The second mini-implants were placed at different angles with respect to the cortical bone: -20° in the direction of the force e (Group I), perpendicular to the force (Group II) and 30° in the opposite direction of the force (Group III). These experimental implants were immediately loaded (right tibias). The Tad`s on the left tibias were regarded as control. The animals were sacrificed six weeks after the first surgery. Linear distances between the two Tad`s were measured with a digital caliper at the time of placement, and after the sacrifice, then were compared. The displacements were: Group I, 2.96 mm ±1.05; Group II, 0.27 mm ±0.36; and Group III, 0.29 mm ±0.26. The controls remained. The values for the micro-implants of Group I showed statistically significant differences (p≤0.05) compared to Groups II y III. Based on these data, we can conclude that mini-implants inclined towards the direction of the force applied induce more displacement than the ones placed perpendicular to the force or in the opposite direction of the force.
References
1. Naik MK, Dharmadeep G, Muralidhar Reddy Y, Cherukuri S, Praveen Raj K, Reddy V. Comparison of the Anchorage Value of the First Molars Supported with Implant and First Molars Supported with Second Molar during En Masse Retraction. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020;10(1):9-15.
2. Echarri P, Kim TW, Favero L, Kim HJ: Ortodoncia & Microimplantes. Técnica completa paso a paso. Madrid: Editorial Médica Ripano, 2007.
3. Miguel JAM, Freitas TEDVS. Immediate orthodontic load on dental implants: an option for adult treatment. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019;24(6):69-79.
4. Basha AG, Shantaraj R, Mogegowda SB. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant. Implant Dent. 2010;19(2):128-136.
5. Becker K, Pliska A, Busch C, Wilmes B, Wolf M, Drescher D. Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4(1):35.
6. Garg KK, Gupta M. Assessment of stability of orthodontic mini-implants under orthodontic loading: A computed tomography study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26(3):237-43.
7. Kravitz N, Kusnoto B. Risk and complication of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:43-49.
8. Wang YC, Liou EJW. Comparision of the loading behavior of self-drilling and pedrilled miniscrews throughout orthodontic loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:38-43.
9. Owens SE, Buschang PH, Cope, JB, Franco PF, Rossouw E. Experimental evaluation of tooth movement in the beagle dog with the miniscrew implant for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:639-646.
10. Nosouhian S, Rismanchian M, Sabzian R, Shadmehr E, Badrian H, Davoudi A. A Mini-review on the Effect of Mini-implants on Contemporary Orthodontic Science. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):83-87.
11. Saleme J, Weber J. Equilibrio de cuerpos vinculados. En: Saleme J, Weber J. Estabilidad. Córdoba: Universitas, 2005:123-129.
12. Kim SH, Cho JH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:36-43.
13. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126(1):42-47.
14. Crismani AG, Bertl M. Celar AG, Bantleon H, Burstone Ch. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: Review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial. 2010;137:108-13.
15. Manni A, Cozzani M, Tamborrino F, De Rinaldis S, Menini A. Factors influencing the stability of miniscrews. A retrospective study on 300 miniscrews. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010;33:388-395.
16. Schatzle M, Mannchen R, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1351–1359.
17. Vilani GN, Ruellas AC, Elias CN, Mattos CT. Stability of smooth and rough mini-implants: clinical and biomechanical evaluation - an in vivo study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20(5):35-42.
18. Melsen B. Mini-Implants: Where are we? J Clin Orthod 2005;39(9):539-547.
19. Upadhyay M, Yadaus S, Naragai K, Patil S. Treatment effects of miniimplants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protensian patients: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:18-29.
20. Choi HJ, Kim TW, Kim HW. A precise wire guide for positioning interradicular miniscrews. J Clin Orthod 2007;41(5):258-261.
21. Kuroda S, Kasuyo Y, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Yamamoto TT. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:68-72.
22. Wu JC, Huang JN, Zhao SF. Bicortical microimplant with 2 anchorage heads for mesial movement of posterior tooth in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:353-359.
23. Kim SH, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G. Surgical positioning of orthodontic miniimplants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:82-89.
24. Massoud S, Negin-Sadat M. Evaluation of primary stability of innovated orthodontic miniscrew system (STS): An ex-vivo study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(3):255-259.
25. Kalra S, Tripathi T, Rai P, Kanase A. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study. Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):61.
26. Kyung HM, Park HS, Bae SM, Sung JH, Kim IB. Development of orthodontic micro-implant for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37:321-328.
27. Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Uprighting second molars with Micro-Implant Anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2004; 38: 100-103.
28. Lee JS, Park HS, Kyung HM. Micro-implant anchorage for lingual treatment of a skeletal class II malocclusion. J Clin Orthod 2001;35(10):643-647.
29. Morea C, Dominguez G, Wou AV, Tortamaro A. Surgical guide for optimal positioning of mini-implants. J Clin Orthod 2005;39(5):317-321.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) después del su publicación en la revista, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
