Schneiderian membrane thickness: Cone Beam Computed Tomography analysis pre and post-sinus floor elevation proc
Keywords:
Computerized tomography cone beam, maxillary sinus, mucosal thickeningAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the thickness of the maxillary sinus mucosa before and after performing the elevation of the maxillary sinus floor in partially and very edentulous patients in the posterior sector using cone beam computed tomography images. Methods: Pre and postsurgical tomographic images of 31 cases were included; 24 of which were a unilateral maxillary sinus floor elevation procedure, while 7 cases involved both pneumatic cavities. Measurements were taken at the sagittal and coronal planes. All of them, perpendicular to the sinus mucosa. A retrospective analysis of cone beam computed tomography was performed and the groups were compared with the Wilcoxon test for related samples and the variables graft size, preoperative membrane thickness, age and gender with multivariate analysis. Setting the level of statistical significance p <0.05. Results: A great variability of the thickness of the sinus membrane was confirmed, both in the pre-operative and in the post-operative. It was observed that the mean values in millimeters obtained in the pre-op were 1.45 and 1.12 in the post-op. The medians showed that the membrane thickness values are more atypical and more extreme in the preoperative values (0.79) than in the postoperative values (0.94), which are more normal and uniform. Conclusion: Under the conditions analyzed, there was an absence of changes in the dimensions of the sinus mucosa in the pre and postoperative period of the tomographic images, highlighting evidence of great inter-individual variability.
References
1. Gabor F, Gruber R, Tangl S, Zechner W, Haas R, Mailath G, Sanroman F. Sinus grafting with autogenous plateletrich plasma and bovine hydroxyapatite. A histomorphometric study in minipigs. Clin. Oral Impl. 2003;14; 500–508.
2. Janner SF, Caversaccio MD, Dubach P, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane: a radiographic analysis using
cone beam computed tomography in patients referred for dental implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Dec;22(12):1446-53.
3. Sousa Nunes L, Bornstein M, Sendi P, Buser D. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients. Referred for implant therapy. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33:337-45.
4. Chiapasco M. Procedimientos de cirugía oral respetando la anatomía. 1 ed. Bs. As. Amolca, 2009.
5. Lathiya V, Kolte A, Kolte R, Mody D. Analysis of association between periodontal disease and thickness of maxillary sinus mucosa using cone beam computed tomography. A retrospective study. Saudi Dental Journal 2019;31:228-235.
6. Misch CE. Implantología Contemporánea. Cap 25. 3 ed. Editorial Elsevier. Barcelona, 2009.
7. Dobele I, Kise L, Apse P, Kragis G, Bigestans A. Radiographic assessment of findings in the maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography. Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal 2013;15:119-122.
8. Ross M, Pawlina W. Histología. Texto y Atlas color con biología celular y molecular. 6 Ed. Buenos Aires, Panamericana. 2012.
9. Goller-Bulut D, Sekerci AE, Köse E, Sisman Y. Cone beam computed tomographic analysis of maxillary premolars and molars to detect the relationship between periapical and marginal bone loss and mucosal thickness of maxillary sinus. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.l 2015 Sep 1;20 (5):e572-9.
10. Bornstein M, Wasmer J, Sendi P, Buser D, Von Arx T. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane and apical bone in maxillary molars referred for apical surgery: A comparative radiographic analysis using limited cone beam computed tomography. JOE 2012;38 (1) 51-7.
11. Nolan P, Freeman K, Kraut R. Correlation Between Schneiderian Membrane Perforation and Sinus Lift Graft Outcome: A Retrospective Evaluation of 359 Augmented Sinus. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2014;72 (1) 47-52.
12. Chan H, Wang H. Sinus Pathology and Anatomy in Relation to Complications in Lateral Window Sinus Augmentation. Implant Dent 2011;20:406–412.
13. Dagassan-Berndt D, Zitzmann N, Lambrecht T, Weiger R, Walter C. Is the Schneiderian Membrane Thickness Affected by Periodontal Disease? A Cone Beam Computed Tomographybased. Extended Case Series. Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology 2013;15/3:75-82.
14. Yilmaz H, Tozum T. Are Gingival Phenotype, Residual Ridge Height, and Membrane Thickness Critical for thePerforation of Maxillary Sinus?. J Periodontol 2012;83:420-425.
15. Shanbbag S, Karnik P, Shirke P. Association between periodontal lesions and maxillary sinus mucosal thickening: a retrospective cone-beam competed tomographic study. J Endod. 2013; 39(7):853-7.
16. Aimetti M, Massei G, Morro M, Cardesi E, Romano F. Correlation between gingival phenotype and Schneiderian membrane thicknees. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23: 1128-1132.
17. Shiki K, Tanaka T, Kito S. The significance of cone beam computed tomography for the visualization of anatomical variation and lesions in the maxillary sinus for patients hoping to have dental implants-supported maxillary restorationsin a private dental office in Japan. Head & Face Medicine 2014;10:20.
18. Kawakami S, Botticelli D, Nakajima Y, Sakuma S. Anatomical analyses for maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a lateral approach: Acone beam computed tomography study. Annals of Anatomy 2019;226:29–34.
19. Khorramdel A, Shirmohammadi A, Sadighi A, Faramarzi M, Reza Babaloo R, Sadighi Shamami M, Mousavi A, Adhami Z. Association between demographic and radiographic characteristics of the schneiderian membrane and periapical and periodontal diseases using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: A retrospective study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2017; 11(3):170-176.
20. Sohn, D.; Maupin, P.; Ponce Fayos, R.; Lee, K.; Jun,S.; Hayashi,Y: Minimally Invasive Sinus Augmentation using Ultrasonic Piezoelectric Vibration and Hydraulic Pressure. The Journal of Implant & Advanced Clinical Dentistry.2010;2:10.
21. Neugebauer J., Ritter,L.; Mischkowski, R.: Evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy by cone beam CT prior to sinus floor elevation. Int.J.Oral. Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 258-265
22. Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014
23. Loin, J., Kün-Darbois, J., Guillaume, B. et al. Elevación del piso del seno maxilar con fosfato beta-tricálcico (beta-TCP) o hueso natural: la misma respuesta inflamatoria. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2019; 30, 97.
24. Makary, C.; Rebaudi, A.; Menhall, A.; Naamán, N.: Changes in the thickness of the sinus membrane after lateral elevation of the sinus floor: a radiographic study. Rev Internacional de Implantes Orales y Maxilofaciales. 2016; 2:331-337
25. Quirynen M, Lefever D, Hellings P, Jacobs R. Transient swelling of the Schneiderian membrane after transversal
sinus augmentation: a pilot study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2014; 25: 36–41
26. Guo-Hao, L., Song Y-L, Xie C, Li D-H. Longitudinal response of membrane thickness and ostium patency following sinus floor elevation: a prospective cohort study. Clin. Oral Impl. 2015, 1–6
27. Temmerman, A.; Van Dessel, J.; Cortellini, S.; Jacobs, R.; Teughels, W.; Quirynen, M.: Volumetric Changes in Grafted Volumes and Schneider's Membrane After Transcrestal and Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures: A Clinical Pilot Study. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44 (6): 660-671.
28. Pommer, B.; Dvorak,G.; Jesch, P.; Palmer,R.; Watzek,G.; and Gahleitner. A.: Effect of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation on Sinus Membrane Thickness in Computed Tomography. J Periodontol. 2012; 551-556
29. Hirota ,A.; Lang ,N.; Ferri, M.; Fortich Mesa,N.; Apaza Alccayhuaman, K.; Botticelli,D.: Tomographic evaluation of the influence of collagen membrane placement underlying the sinus mucosa during maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Implant Dent. 2019;5: 31.
30. Lim,H.; Nam, J.; Cha, J.; Seok Lee, J. Jung, U.; Choi, S.: Retrospective analysis of sinus membrane thickening: profile, causal factors, and its influence on complications Implant Dentistry. 2017; 6868-874.
31. Bissoli C, Gómez Ágreda C, Mitsunari Takeshita W, De Melo Castilho J, Medici Filho E, Leonelli De Moraes M. Importancia y aplicaciones del sistema de Tomografia Computarizada Cone-Beam (CBCT). Acta Odontológica Venezolana 2007; 45(4).
32. Dinato J, Polido W. Implantes Oseosintegrados. Cirugía y Prótesis. 1 ed. Bs. As. Artes Médicas. 2003
33. Gu Y, Sun C, Wu D, Zhu Q, Leng D, Zhou Y. Evaluation of the relationship between maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18(1):164.
34. Martinez B, Poladian M, Dagun H, Bruno E. Estudios radiográficos previos a la colocación de implantes. ¿Cuál es el apropiado? RAOA 2010; (98) 3 231-5.
35. Kenneth MT, Karl Dula PD, Walter Bürgin MS, Von Arx T. Comparison of Periapical Radiography and Limited Cone-Beam Tomography in Posterior Maxillary Teeth Referred for Apical Surgery. J Endod 2008;34:557–562.
36. Luz J, Greutmann D, Wiedemeier D, Rostetter C, Rücker M, Stadlinger B. 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography. International Journal of Implant Dentistry 2018 Jun 5;4(1):17.
37. Anduze-Acher G, Brochery B, Felizardo R, Valentini P, Katsahian S, Bouchard P. Change in sinus membrane dimension following sinus floor elevation: a retrospective cohort study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2013; (24); 1123–1129.
38. Maska B, Lin GH, Othman A, Behdin S, Travan S, Benavides E, Kapila Y. Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening. Int J Implant Dent. 2017 Dec; 3(1):1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) después del su publicación en la revista, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
