Meninas do Radium
www.revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revistaEF
REVISTA DE ENSEÑANZA DE LA FÍSICA, Vol. 33, no. 2 (2021) 382
In the perspective of Denzin and Lincoln (2006, p. 16), "the word qualitative implies an emphasis on the qualities
of the entities and on the processes that cannot be examined or measured experimentally in terms of quantity, vol-
ume, intensity or frequency".
The methodological basis used in our work was the Content Analysis proposed by Laurence Bardin (1977), with a
focus on categorical analysis. We performed the analysis of the comments of the spectators of three lectures given by
the research and extension project “Meninas do Radium: A periferia também faz Ciência”, with remote work through
digital media, due to the covid-19 pandemic. The first lecture to be analyzed was "Mulheres na Ciência: Impacto das
Questões de Gênero e covid-19" ("Women in science: Impact of gender issues and covid-19"), held on June 30th of 2020,
with the aim of promoting gender issues, as they perpetuate and reverberate in the current context and impacts of
this during the pandemic. The second had the title: "A construção do lugar social das mulheres no Brasil moderno e as con-
tribuições da História" ("The construction of the women social place in modern Brazil and the contributions of history"),
and it was carried out on September 16th of 2020, with the objective of thinking about the contributions of history
and its methods in the understanding of the construction of the social place of women in modern Brazil. The last
lecture, entitled "Cientistas: Rebeldes e Insubordinadas" ("Scientists: Rebels and Insubordinates''), was performed on
the October 21st of 2020, with aspects that deal with making women who contributed to the Exact and Natural Sci-
ences visible, such as Physics, discussion of systems of oppression that are perpetuated to the present day, in addition
to a brief presentation of questions about the representativeness of the 2020 Nobel Prize.
The products mentioned above were transmitted through social networks, such as the YouTube channel and the
Instagram profile. The lectures were organized as follows: Initial contact with the researcher who gave the lecture,
then a collaborative card was built, a mini summary was developed with all the necessary links to be sent to viewers
through social networks and- mail, and a post was also made on social networks about the lecture that would be
presented, by Meninas do Radium and also by other partner groups. The three lectures were of a scientific nature and
were given by women. Gender issues were raised by the people who were watching, and even by the Meninas do
Radium team in order to foster discussions.
To carry out the analysis, we extracted excerpts from the comments that characterized the record units and ena-
bled the creation of categories according to the themes of the lectures, using as theoretical framework authors who
discuss the issues mentioned above, such as: Lélia Gonzalez, Simone de Beauvoir, Angela Davis, Sueli Carneiro. For the
elaboration of the categories, excerpts from the comments were highlighted that involve axes with the themes: gen-
der, gender violence, gender and race, social class, gender and human rights, the awakening to become a researcher,
the representativeness of the work of a teacher in students' lives and empowerment.
The three lectures were open to the general public, which does not allow us to have total control of who was
watching. However, from the registration forms made available so that we could issue certificates, it was possible to
determine a large part of our audience in relation to gender, race, location etc.
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this section, we introduce the results obtained from the analysis of the registration forms and the comments made
by the public of the three lectures quoted, all held in the year 2020. Finally, we bring a reflection on these results.
From the point of view of the audience, the results demonstrate that: with respect to the locality, as we are located
in the State of Rio de Janeiro, it ends that, on average, 64% of our audience is also from this state. The second most
representative Brazilian state is the one in São Paulo, with 11% of the spectators of these three live streams, however
we also had the participation of people from all Brazilian regions besides the Southeast. Although we are at a university
on the outskirts of the metropolitan region in the state of Rio de Janeiro, we have a large concentration of listeners in
the capital, the city of Rio de Janeiro (32%), followed by two of the cities that comprise UFRRJ's campus, the Seropédica
headquarters (11%) and the Multidisciplinary Institute’s city, Nova Iguaçu (7%), and other people are divided by inte-
rior and peripheral regions, in Rio de Janeiro and in other states. Our audience, mainly due to our themes and recep-
tion environment, is mostly female (72%), 28% male and less than 1% non-binary, 97% of them are cisgender and 3%
are transgender people. Regarding their sexuality, 67% identify themselves as heterosexual. In racial terms, we always
try to encourage debates, so that we have: white (43%) and non-white (57%), in this category we have a majority of
black people (55%), indigenous people (2%) and Asian people (0, 3%), the other 0.3% belong to those who declared
to have no ethnicity. In all of these three lectures, only one person had some kind of specific need, low vision. As for
schooling and research areas, 70% of our viewers had their undergraduate degree still in progress, 13% graduated, 8%
with a master's degree, 7% already with doctorates and 5% of high school students. Of all these people, the course
with the largest number is the Degree in Physics (more than 40%), but we can also observe the participation of people
from other areas, such as chemistry (9%), and less expressive numbers of courses such as History, Pedagogy, Tourism,