Influencia de la interacción de grupos de interés en la vocación innovativa de PyMEs mexicanas

Autores/as

  • Saul Alfonso Esparza-Rodriguez Arkansas State University

Palabras clave:

grupos de interés, innovación, vocación, Pymes

Resumen

La innovación en las pequeñas y medianas empresas (Pymes) es un proceso que incluye un amplio rango de interacciones entre las partes interesadas y las organizaciones. En ese sentido, los datos relacionados con la interacción entre grupos de interés con las compañías en México han sido recolectados por la encuesta ENAPROCE, la cual es una fuente de información que incluye datos estadísticos de un número considerable de empresas alrededor del país. El presente trabajo busca contribuir al entendimiento de la parte que los grupos de interés tales como dueños, empleados, fuentes de financiamiento, gobierno, administradores y laparticipación en cadenas productivas como fuentes de la innovación tecnológica. Una regresión de tipo logit multinomial fue utilizada para determinar cuál indicador relacionado con los grupos de interés mencionados es relevante para realizar predicciones de la vocación innovadora de las Pymes mexicanas. Las interacciones que resultaron de mayor relevancia incluyen tipo de dueños, capacitación y entrenamiento, financiamiento y la participación en cadenas productivas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Abiodun Eniola, A., & Entebang, H. (2015). SME Firm Performance-Financial Innovation and Challenges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.361

Agresti, A. (2007). An introduction to categorical data analysis. Statistics in Medicine (Vol. 28). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3564

Ali, Z., Sun, H., & Ali, M. (2017). The impact of managerial and adaptive capabilities to stimulate organizational innovation in SMEs: A complimentary PLS-SEM approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122157

APEC. (2013). SMEs ’ Participation in Global Production Chains.

Arvanitis, Y. (2015). Financing for innovation: What can be done for African SMEs ? AFrica Economic Brief, 6(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1038.6649

Babkin, A. V., Lipatnikov, V. S., & Muraveva, S. V. (2015). Assessing the Impact of Innovation Strategies and Costs on the Performance of IT Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.153

Cancino, C. A., Bonilla, C. A., & Vergara, M. (2015). The impact of government support programs on the development of businesses in Chile. Management Decision, 53(8), 1736–1754. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2014-0428

Dahlan, J. M., Samat, O., & Othman, A. A. (2015). Upgrading in Global Value Chain of Malaysian Aviation Industry. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 839–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01176-4

Devaux, A., Horton, D., Velasco, C., Thiele, G., López, G., Bernet, T., … Ordinola, M. (2009). Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes. Food Policy, 34(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.007

Dzeletovic, M., Milosevic, M., & Cicic, S. (2017). Venture capital: Generator of growth of SME investment activities. Industrija, 45(3), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.5937/industrija45-11210

Engez, A. (2018). STAKEHOLDERS CONTRIBUTING TO COMMERCIALIZATION OF A RADICAL INNOVATION AT GLOBAL MARKETS: A SINGLE CASE STUDY. Retrieved from https://dspace.cc.tut.fi/dpub/bitstream/handle/123456789/26571/Engez.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Freeman, E., Harrison, J., Hicks, A., Parmar, B., & Colle, S. de. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The state of the art.

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Paulo, Evans, S., & Steve. (2017). The Cambridge Business Model Innovation Process. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.033

Granata, J., Garaudel, M., Gundolf, K., Gast, J., & Marques, P. (2016). Organizational innovation and coopetition between SMEs: a tertius strategies approach. International Journal of Technology Management, 71(1/2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2016.077975

Greenacre, P., Gross, R., & Speirs, J. (2012). Innovation Theory: A review of the literature. Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and Technology (ICEPT), (May), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.04.067

Hirsch, J., Rodriguez, N., & Rosas, B. (2020). Decisiones gerenciales en empresas familiares en Querétaro , México, 10(July), 6–26.

Huang, Z. (2016). Fostering Strategic Innovation Management for SMEs Multiple case studies in China. Retrieved from https://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/99861/978-952-03-0236-8.pdf?sequence=1

Iriarte Rivas, C. G. (2018). Unemployment transitions in the Mexican labour market and the role of job search channels. Econoquantum, 15(2), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.18381/eq.v15i2.7128

Khoe, K., & Kim, D. (2015). The impact of government sponsored loan programs for SMEs in IT: With a focus on case studies in Korea. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(27). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i27/81673

Maalouf, G. (2018). Impact of Improved Supply Chain Management on Innovation. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 8(2), 8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb51505.x

Majava, J. (2016). ECOSYSTEM STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS : AN INNOVATION-DRIVEN ENTERPRISE ’ S PERSPECTIVE Abstract : In Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time. Management, Knowledge amd Learning. Joint International Conference 2016 (pp. 373–379). Retrieved from http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-16-1/papers/ML16-078.pdf

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105

Moghimi, S., & Devi Subramaniam, I. (2013). Employees’ Creative Behavior: The Role of Organizational Climate in Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n5p1

Monge-González, R., Rodríguez-Alvarez, J. A., & Leiva, J. C. (2016). An impact evaluation of a fund to finance innovation in SMEs. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 29(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-02-2015-0041

OCDE. (2017). Economy: Raising productivity in small traditional enterprises. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264187030-en

OECD. (2017). Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs in a Global and Digitalised Economy. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, (June), 1–24. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/mcm/documents/C-MIN-2017-8-EN.pdf

OECD. (2018a). Innovation in Skills Development in SMEs Highlights. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.074

OECD. (2018b). Promoting innovation in established SMEs. In SME Ministerial Conference (p. 10). Retrieved fromhttps://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/ministerial/documents/2018-SME-Ministerial-Conference-Parallel-Session-4.pdf

OECD, & Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

Osuga, P. O. (2016). THE EFFECTS OF STRATEGIC INNOVATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SMES IN NAIROBI COUNTY. Retrieved from http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11732/2588/The Effects Of Strategic Innovation On The Performance Of Smes In Nairobi County.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Palangkaraya, A., Spurling, T., & Webster, E. (2015). Does innovation make ( SME ) firms more productive ? Small Business Conditions and Finance, (March), 181–199. Retrieved from https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/confs/2015/pdf/palangkaraya-spurling-webster.pdf

Rezaei, J., Ortt, R., & Trott, P. (2018). Supply chain drivers, partnerships and performance of high-tech SMEs: An empirical study using SEM. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(4), 629–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2017-0017

Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011

Sharma, N. (2016). Innovative Behaviour of Indian SMEs: An Empirical Study. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2872721

Shigeno, H. (2017). Empirical Analysis of the Innovation Process of SMEs by Structural Equation Modeling ( SEM ).

Silva, J. (2017). Small and medium-sized businesses in Mexico. Espacios, 38(57).

Skibiński, A., & Sipa, M. (2015). Sources of Innovation of Small Businesses: Polish Perspective. Procedia Economics and Finance, 27, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01017-5

Sorama, K., & Joensuu-Salo, S. (2016). A Case Study of Entrepreneurial Ecosystem related to Growth Firms.

Verbeek, M. (2004). A guide to modern econometrics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Vu, H. N., & Doan, Q. H. (2015). Innovation and Performance of Enterprises: The Case of SMEs in Vietnam. MPRA Paper, (70589). https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000349921.14519.2A

Waycaster, G., Bes, C., Bilotkach, V., Gogu, C., Haftka, R., & Kim, N. H. (2015). The effect of stakeholder interactions on design decisions. In Computational Methods in Applied Sciences (Vol. 38, pp. 413–425). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18320-6_22

WEF. (2021). Future Readiness of SMEs: Mobilizing the SME Sector to Drive Widespread Sustainability and Prosperity. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_Readiness_of_SMEs_2021.pdf

Xerri, M. J., & Brunetto, Y. (2011). THE IMPACT OF THE PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF WORKPLACE SOCIAL NETWORKS UPON THE INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOUR OF SME EMPLOYEES: A SOCIAL CAPITAL PERSPECTIVE. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(05), 959–987. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003350

Publicado

2022-07-11

Cómo citar

Esparza-Rodriguez, S. A. (2022). Influencia de la interacción de grupos de interés en la vocación innovativa de PyMEs mexicanas. Pymes, Innovación Y Desarrollo, 10(1), 02–23. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pid/article/view/38276