CLÍNIC CASE
Amyand's hernia complicated with appendicitis
Hernia de Amyand complicada con apendicitis
Hérnia de Amyand complicada com apendicite
Franco Corvatta1, Fanny Rodriguez Santos2, Federico Mazzini3, Ignacio Fuente4
1- MD, Resident, Department of General Surgery of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Contact Mail:: franco.corvatta@hospitalitaliano.org.ar
2- MD, Contracted surgeon, Specialist in Phlebolymphology, Department of General Surgery of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
3- MD, Contracted surgeon, Specialist in Trauma Surgery, Department of General Surgery of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina
4- MD, Contracted surgeon, Specialist in Oesophagogastric and Duodenal Surgery, Department of General Surgery of Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
El hallazgo de un apéndice normal dentro de una hernia inguinal ocurre en alrededor del 1% de los casos. Sin embargo, la combinación de una apendicitis (inflamación del apéndice) y una hernia inguinal atascada es una entidad aún más rara, presentada en menos del 0,8% de los casos. En este trabajo presentamos un caso y discusión sobre la literatura disponible, exponiendo acerca de la presentación clínica, el diagnóstico y tratamiento de esta patología. Cabe destacar la utilidad de la Tomografía Computada como estudio complementario previo a realizar el tratamiento quirúrgico.
The finding of a vermiform appendix within the peritoneal sac of an indirect inguinal hernia was first described by De Garengeot in 1731 (1). This incidental finding occurs in approximately 1% of cases of inguinal hernia (2), however, the presence of appendicitis within an inguinal hernial sac is found only in 0.08% of the general population (3). In 1735 Claudius Amyand performed the first appendectomy through an inguinal herniotomy, giving the name to this entity (1).
CASE REPORT
A 58-year-old male patient with unremarkable past medical history was admitted to the emergency department for abdominal pain. Physical examination revealed a distended abdomen without peritoneal signs. A small non-reducible right groin mass with severe tenderness to palpation was noted. After clinical evaluation, a laboratory was performed showing a white blood cell count of 16.500/mm3 (normal range: 4.000- 11.000/mm3). A Computed tomography (CT) showed right inguinal hernia with an incarcerated, inflamed vermiform appendix with an air-fluid level (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Abdominal computed tomography showing right inguinal hernia with an incarcerated, inflamed vermiform appendix (yellow arrow).
Based on the presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis, we carried out a laparoscopic approach. During exploration, we found the appendix protruding through the right deep inguinal ring (Figure 2 A-B). As a remarkable note, we found a left inguinal hernia with no signs of complications. The herniated appendix was reduced into the abdominal cavity, evidencing an 8 x 6 cm appendix (Figure 2 C-D).
A standard laparoscopic appendectomy was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged the following day. The pathology report was consistent with acute phlegmonous appendicitis.
Figure 2: A-B: Appendix protruding through the right deep inguinal ring (yellow arrow). C-D: Appendix reduced into the abdominal cavity (yellow arrow).
The finding of an inflamed appendix within an inguinal hernial sac occurs in less than 0.1% of cases of the general population (3). This entity has been reported in a variety of ages, from 3 weeks to 88 years old. Males are more often affected by inguinal hernias. However, the concomitant occurrence of acute appendicitis in the sac of a crural hernia is more frequent in females (4). The clinical presentation does not differ from an acute appendicitis, with abdominal pain and tenderness in the lower right quadrant, associated with a non-reductible groin mass due to an inguinal or femoral hernia. Differential diagnosis has to be made with epiploic strangulation and Richter's hernia (4). The diagnosis is rarely established preoperatively in patients without a palpable groin mass. Imaging studies such as abdominal and pelvic CT can demonstrate a blind-ending tubular structure arising from the caecum which extends into the inguinal sac. A dilated lumen, enhanced and thickened wall, and striaton of adjacent peri-appendiceal fat are suggestive signs of acute appendicitis. Ultrasonography (USG) can also demonstrate the extension of the appendix into the inguinal sac, and in case of acute inflammation, the appendix is dilated, non-compressible, thickened and hypervascular. Therefore, USG is an useful radiation-free imaging modality for children and pregnant women (5). Although abdominal CT may be helpful in reaching the correct diagnosis, in the vast majority of the cases the diagnosis is confirmed intraoperatively (6). Regarding the treatment of complicated Amyand´s hernias, Losanoff et al established a classification in order to improve their management. In the presence of an Amyand's hernia complicated with acute appendicitis, reduction of the hernia with mesh-free repair of the inguinal floor associated with appendectomy is recommended (7). However, an individualized approach must be performed since it depends on the state and integrity of the appendix.
Published evidence regarding appendicitis in an Amyand hernia describes a combined treatment of appendectomy plus hernia repair (4,7). In the present case, inguinal repair was not performed due to small size of the right defect in addition to the finding of bilateral inguinal hernia. Considering that the patient will undergo a second surgery for left inguinal hernia and taking into account that the surgery was carried out during the COVID-19 outbreak and a reduced surgery time was sought, we decided to only reduce the content of the inguinal hernia and perform the laparoscopic appendectomy.
Acute appendicitis in an Amyand's hernia is a very rare entity that can be easily misdiagnosed preoperatively. CT is extremely useful in reaching the correct preoperative diagnosis.
1. Thomas WE, Vowles KD, Williamson RC. Appendicitis in external herniae. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1982 Mar;64(2):121-2.
2. Singh K, Singh RR, Kaur S. Amyand's hernia. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2011 Oct;16(4):171-2. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.86890.
3. García-Cano E, Martínez-Gasperin J, Rosales-Pelaez C, Hernández-Zamora V, Montiel-Jarquín JÁ, Franco-Cravioto F. Hernia de Amyand y apendicitis complicada; presentación de un caso y elección de tratamiento quirúrgico [Amyand's hernia and complicated appendicitis; case presentation and surgical treatment choice]. Cir Cir. 2016 Jan-Feb;84(1):54-7. Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.circir.2015.06.012
4. D'Alia C, Lo Schiavo MG, Tonante A, Taranto F, Gagliano E, Bonanno L, Di Giuseppe G, Pagano D, Sturniolo G. Amyand's hernia: case report and review of the literature. Hernia. 2003 Jun;7(2):89-91. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0098-5.
5. Tsang WK, Lee KL, Tam KF, Lee SF. Acute appendicitis complicating Amyand's hernia: imaging features and literature review. Hong Kong Med J. 2014 Jun;20(3):255-7. doi: 10.12809/hkmj133971.
6. Yagnik VD. Amyand hernia with appendicitis. Clin Pract. 2011 Apr 22;1(2):e24. doi: 10.4081/cp.2011.e24.
7. Losanoff JE, Basson MD. Amyand hernia: a classification to improve management. Hernia. 2008 Jun;12(3):325-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0331-y.
Recibido: 2020-10-28 Aceptado: 2021-09-22
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31053/1853.0605.v78.n3.30705
© Universidad Nacional de Córdoba