Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony

Authors

  • María Belén Colasurdo Centro de Estudios Sociales Regionales. Centro de Estudios Sociales Regionales/Investigaciones Socio-históricas Regionales
  • Julieta Isabel Sartori Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Sociales Regionales/Investigaciones Socio-históricas Regionales. Fundación de Arqueología del Litoral.
  • Sandra Cristina Escudero Dpto. Arqueología. Municipalidad de Rosario. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v3.n1.5456

Keywords:

memory, identity, patrimony, museum, anthropology

Abstract

This paper is about the relation between the concepts of Memory – Identity – Patrimony from an anthropological focus. Since the intrinsic ambiguity of those concepts, it´s considered the preponderant role play by the mechanism of memory/oblivion-individual identities/collective identity in the choose of what it will be considered patrimony inside a community. The concept of patrimony have not been the same along the history and its changing meaning have evolve since the idea of an illustrated treasure to the idea of a touristic resource, and rating it as a cultural product and a mechanism of identity construction. The museum is one of the institution in charge of determine and perpetuate what is consider patrimony and what is not. This could represent the past, in a reliable way or not, it could distort it from its selections and classifications, it could restrict the past because of its codes of historic representation, the way in which it tell it story, the way in which the artifacts are presented. The artifacts are gathered and presented to generate a particular sense to the visitor that observes it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Augé, M. 1998. Las formas del olvido. Gedisa. Barcelona.

Bourdieu, P.1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Boylan, P. 1996 Cincuenta años del ICOM. Museum International 191 (XLVIII,3):47-50.

Candau, J. 2002. Antropología de la Memoria. Nueva Visión. Bs.As

Delfino, D .y P. Rodríguez. 1992. Los Museos de Arqueología. Ausencia del Presente en las representaciones del Pasado. http://www.naya.org.ar/articulos/museologia04.htm. (Última consulta:12/04/2010).

Fernández de Paz, E. 2006. De tesoro ilustrado a recurso turístico: el cambiante significado del patrimonio cultural. Pasos. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural 4(1):1-12. http//www.passonline.org. (Última consulta: 14/07/06).

Garcés, E. 2004. Patrimonio, políticas de la memoria e institucionalización de la cultura. ICONOS Nº 20:26-34.

Greenberg, R., B. W. Ferguson and S. Nairne (eds). 1996. Thinking about exhibitions. London, Routledge.

Hall, S. 1995. A Questão da identidade cultural. Textos Didáticos Nº 18:59-72.

Iniesta, M. 1994 Els gabinets del món. Antropologia, museus i museologies. Pagès editors, Lleida. Instituto Colombiano de Cultura. 1980. Museología y patrimonio cultural; críticas y perspectivas. Bogotá.

Le Goff, J. 1991. El orden de la memoria. El tiempo como imaginario. Paidós. Buenos Aires.

Pereiro, X. 2004. Apuntes de Antropología y Memoria. Revista O Fiadeiro Nº 15: 123-158.

Shanks, M y C, Tilley. 1997. Re-Constructing Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-26

Issue

Section

Museology

How to Cite

Colasurdo, M. B., Sartori, J. I., & Escudero, S. C. (2010). Some thoughts on the implications of memory and identity in the constitution of the patrimony. Revista Del Museo De Antropología, 3(1), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.31048/1852.4826.v3.n1.5456

Similar Articles

61-70 of 589

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.